2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2005.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of hyperpycnal plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose the presence of point-source input of river sediment in a tidal estuary imposes a longitudinal density gradient along the bottom due to the influence of the sediment concentration on water density, a sediment gravity current (hyperpycnal plume) will be generated as observed by Wright et al (2001), Scully et al (2002), and Khan et al (2005). In the Huanghe (Yellow River) mouth, the flow associated with hyperpycnal plume (hyperpycnal flow) can reach up to 0.4 m/s where sediment-induced water density anomaly is in the order of 10 kg/m 3 (Wright et al 1988(Wright et al , 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose the presence of point-source input of river sediment in a tidal estuary imposes a longitudinal density gradient along the bottom due to the influence of the sediment concentration on water density, a sediment gravity current (hyperpycnal plume) will be generated as observed by Wright et al (2001), Scully et al (2002), and Khan et al (2005). In the Huanghe (Yellow River) mouth, the flow associated with hyperpycnal plume (hyperpycnal flow) can reach up to 0.4 m/s where sediment-induced water density anomaly is in the order of 10 kg/m 3 (Wright et al 1988(Wright et al , 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviors of hyperpycnal flows remain unclear due to difficulties on in-situ field observations. However, numerical modeling and experimental works (Khan et al 2005 and reference therein) point out that current speed, direction, and the seafloor slope are important factors determining its discharge. Additionally, recent modeling has shown that a turbidity current can move in an opposite direction from the overlying current as the two flows often decouple during a serious hyperpycnal flood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The undulations of the study area display an along-slope trend that is compatible with their interpretation as the product of hyperpycnal flows. Furthermore, several Apennine Rivers are likely to develop hyperpycnal discharges (Khan et al 2005). However, differently from most undulations produced by turbidity currents and hyperpycnal flows, the observed undulations are apparently standing with no evident signs of migration, change their wavelength from one to another without any appreciable trend, and are unrelated to erosional features.…”
Section: Seafloor Undulations With Internal Layered Seismic Faciesmentioning
confidence: 93%