2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture problem in permeable medium using cohesive zone model

Abstract: International audienceThis paper considers the problem of a fluid-driven fracture propagating in a permeable poroelastic medium. We develop a zero-thickness finite element to model the fracture. The fracture propagation is governed by a cohesive zone model and the flow within the fracture by the lubrication equation. The hydro-mechanical equations are solved with a fully coupled approach, using the developed zero-thickness element for the propagating fracture and conventional bulk finite elements for the surro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
225
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(87 reference statements)
16
225
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach is, of course, attractive from a theoretical point of view as it does not rely on the assumptions behind Carter's leak-off. In the limit of negligible poroelastic coupling and small rock diffusivity (compared to the injection duration), the results obtained are similar to the Carter's leak-off model (Carrier and Granet, 2012;Kovalyshen and Detournay, 2013). Poroelastic effects are obviously important when the injection duration is similar to the rock diffusion time-scales.…”
Section: Poroelasticitysupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such an approach is, of course, attractive from a theoretical point of view as it does not rely on the assumptions behind Carter's leak-off. In the limit of negligible poroelastic coupling and small rock diffusivity (compared to the injection duration), the results obtained are similar to the Carter's leak-off model (Carrier and Granet, 2012;Kovalyshen and Detournay, 2013). Poroelastic effects are obviously important when the injection duration is similar to the rock diffusion time-scales.…”
Section: Poroelasticitysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Instead of utilizing Carter's leak-off approximation, one can instead simulate the reservoir as a porous medium and couple the equations of poroelasticity with the flow in the deformable hydraulic fracture (Boone and Ingraffea, 1990;Carrier and Granet, 2012). Such an approach is, of course, attractive from a theoretical point of view as it does not rely on the assumptions behind Carter's leak-off.…”
Section: Poroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Segura and Carol [14,15] introduced a hydro-mechanical coupling formulation using zero-thickness interface elements with double nodes based on the FEM. Carrier and Granet [16] also used interface elements but included an additional degree of freedom for the pressure in the fracture. Recently, also advancements were made in continuum based hydraulic fracturing simulations using a phase-field approach [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O modelo da zona coesiva (MZC) para fraturas, originalmente proposto por Barrenblatt (1962) e Dugdale (1960), tem sido amplamente usado com sucesso para simular processos de fraturamento em rochas (Cheng 2009,2012, Zielonka 2013, Carrier 2012, Shen 2012. Este modelo postula a existência de uma zona de processo de fratura caracterizada por uma lei coesiva de tensão de tração vs separação na ponta da fratura.…”
Section: 1modelo Da Zona Coesivaunclassified