2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10881-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of groundwater flow and nitrate transport using MODFLOW and MT3DMS in the Karaj alluvial aquifer, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for transient-state calibration, the model was calibrated at a monthly time step for 2020 for 13 piezometers. The hydraulic parameters, including saturated hydraulic conductivity, recharge rate, stream bed conductivity, specific yield, and specific storage, were manually adjusted using a trial-and-error process during calibration [47,48]. The goodness of fit of the observed and simulated SGW head was assessed by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean error (ME).…”
Section: Sgw Flow Model Calibration and Validation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for transient-state calibration, the model was calibrated at a monthly time step for 2020 for 13 piezometers. The hydraulic parameters, including saturated hydraulic conductivity, recharge rate, stream bed conductivity, specific yield, and specific storage, were manually adjusted using a trial-and-error process during calibration [47,48]. The goodness of fit of the observed and simulated SGW head was assessed by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean error (ME).…”
Section: Sgw Flow Model Calibration and Validation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of fit of the observed and simulated SGW head was assessed by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean error (ME). RMSE and ME values near zero indicate better model performance [23,41,48,49]. R 2 values range from 0 to 1, where close to 1 represents a good fit between observed data and model-simulated output [41,48,49].…”
Section: Sgw Flow Model Calibration and Validation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discretization is often achieved through finite difference or finite element methods, and the process is iteratively repeated at each time step. These numerical models are extensively employed in aquifer resource management (Omar et al 2020;Miro et al 2021;Ostad-Ali-Askari & Shayannejad 2021), design of aquifer storage and recovery schemes (LaHaye et al 2021;Tiwari et al 2022Tiwari et al , 2023, drought risk management (Shivakoti et al 2019;Wossenyeleh et al 2021), and aquifer pollution control (Robinson et al 2009;Guo et al 2021;Panjehfouladgaran & Rajabi 2022;Shakeri et al 2023). However, the computational expense of numerical methods used in regional groundwater simulations can pose a significant obstacle for tasks that involve repeated simulations, such as uncertainty analysis and simulation-based optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%