2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of floating bodies transport for flooding analysis in nuclear reactor building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 The flood and resulting submersion, spray, water pressure, wave impact, and high-temperature steam have the potential to threaten the reliability of many SSCs. Wang et al 37 evaluated flood propagation and its impact on floating bodies in the layout of AP1000. Wells et al 38 performed fragility experiments and probabilistic modeling of full-scale interior doors against flood pressure.…”
Section: Flooding Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 The flood and resulting submersion, spray, water pressure, wave impact, and high-temperature steam have the potential to threaten the reliability of many SSCs. Wang et al 37 evaluated flood propagation and its impact on floating bodies in the layout of AP1000. Wells et al 38 performed fragility experiments and probabilistic modeling of full-scale interior doors against flood pressure.…”
Section: Flooding Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They divided the computation space into multiple small spaces in order to make the simulation run in parallel [32]. Wang et al [33] simulated floating bodies transported by fluid using the MPS method and the PMS model for an incompressible fluid and the interaction of rigid bodies and fluid, as well as the discrete element method for explicitly calculated inter-rigid-body contacts. In the MPS method, the pressure of a fluid is implicitly computed by solving the pressure Poisson equation and thus the pressure field of rigid bodies in the PMS method is implicitly calculated along with that of the fluid when this method is used in combination with the MPS method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lagrangian meshfree particle methods, including smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) 1 and moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) 2 methods, have great advantages in simulating complicated interfacial flows. During recent years, the particle methods have been used to simulate free surface flow (eg, dam break, 2,3 sloshing, 4 waves, 5,6 and droplet deformation 7,8 ), multiphase flow (eg, gas-liquid, [9][10][11][12] liquid-liquid [13][14][15] flows) and fluid-solid interaction flow (eg, fluid-rigid- [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and fluid-elastic-structure 23,24 interactions). Meanwhile, the accuracy and stability of particle methods have been remarkably improved to enhance the reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%