2021
DOI: 10.1121/10.0005518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical-modeling-based investigation of sound transmission and reception in the short-finned pilot whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus)

Abstract: The sound-transmission, beam-formation, and sound-reception processes of a short-finned pilot whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus) were investigated using computed tomography (CT) scanning and numerical simulation. The results showed that sound propagations in the forehead were modulated by the upper jaw, air components, and soft tissues, which attributed to the beam formation in the external acoustic field. These structures owned different acoustic impedance and formed a multiphasic sound transmission system th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a new experimental setup was used to visualize the motion of the isolated otoliths in 4D, providing insights into the motion of auditory structures (Maiditsch et al, 2022). Besides, finite element modeling offers an alternative way to study the roles of the otoliths in fish hearing and has been widely used in odontocetes to investigate sound transmission and reception (Cranford and Krysl, 2015; Song et al, 2021; Tubelli et al, 2018), which may facilitate more studies on hearing mechanism in fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new experimental setup was used to visualize the motion of the isolated otoliths in 4D, providing insights into the motion of auditory structures (Maiditsch et al, 2022). Besides, finite element modeling offers an alternative way to study the roles of the otoliths in fish hearing and has been widely used in odontocetes to investigate sound transmission and reception (Cranford and Krysl, 2015; Song et al, 2021; Tubelli et al, 2018), which may facilitate more studies on hearing mechanism in fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details concerning computed tomography scanning, sound speed, and density measurements can be found in our previous paper [ 32 ]. The compressional and shear wave speeds of the skull structures were set as 3380 m/s and 2200 m/s respectively, and the density was 2035 kg/m 3 [ 16 , 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details concerning computed tomography scanning, sound speed, and density measurements can be found in our previous paper [32]. The compressional and shear wave speeds of the skull structures were set as 3380 m/s and 2200 m/s respectively, and the density was 2035 kg/m 3 [16,39]. The directivities of sound reception were addressed for 54 kHz at frequency domain, at which the finless porpoise had the best hearing sensitivity [35,36].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling and Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%