2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9808-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling and simulation of water cooling-controlled solidification for aluminum alloy investment casting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the actual average cooling time for an injection mold with conventional cooling channels was about 361.1 s. The standard deviation was about 12.7 s. The actual average cooling time for an injection mold with optimum CCCs was about 109.2 s. The standard deviation was about 6.8 s. However, the actual cooling time for an injection mold without cooling channels was about 952.1 s. It is clear that the reduction in cooling time of about 89% was obtained. As can be seen, the low-volume production of wax patterns can be fabricated swiftly and inexpensively for investment casting of metal components with simple geometries [ 39 , 40 ]. The cooling time can be shortened for an injection mold with optimum, but the cooling efficiency is limited to the thermal conductivity of the mold materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, the actual average cooling time for an injection mold with conventional cooling channels was about 361.1 s. The standard deviation was about 12.7 s. The actual average cooling time for an injection mold with optimum CCCs was about 109.2 s. The standard deviation was about 6.8 s. However, the actual cooling time for an injection mold without cooling channels was about 952.1 s. It is clear that the reduction in cooling time of about 89% was obtained. As can be seen, the low-volume production of wax patterns can be fabricated swiftly and inexpensively for investment casting of metal components with simple geometries [ 39 , 40 ]. The cooling time can be shortened for an injection mold with optimum, but the cooling efficiency is limited to the thermal conductivity of the mold materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the price–performance ratio of this SRM made by the optimal recipe is around 55. It should be noted that the SRM made with recipe 4 seems to be a promising method to manufacture wax patterns for manufacturing customized metal components through investment casting technology [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. However, adding fillers into the SRM changes the material composition, which brings other problems, including wasted material recycling and environmental friendliness are also important research issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the reformer model is secured, the whole system is sink in a water bath at a temperature of between about 5 and 12 ° C for a period corresponding to about one production cycle. [6] Fig. 1…”
Section: Analysis Of Wax Pattern Blades Segment Manufacturing Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%