2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-82052005000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical methods for the dynamics of unbounded domains

Abstract: Mathematical subject classification: 78A40, 80M10, 80M15.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This disadvantage makes the FEM less efficient than the boundary element method (BEM) in dealing with fracture problems (Datas, 2020;Jing, 2003) The boundaries of the continuum are discretised only in the boundary element method (BEM), whereas the complete domain needs to be discretized in the FDM and FEM methods (Jing and Hudson, 2002;Manouchehrian et al, 2012). In addition, there is no artificial boundaries are required where the common problems in geomechanics are the extended medium to infinity, while the artificial boundaries are required in both FDM and FEM methods (Fahmy, 2021;Mesquita and Pavanello, 2005). BEMs are especially convenient to address the static continuum problems with small boundary to volume ratios, with stress and elastic behaviour or displacements implemented to the boundaries (Gao, 2003).…”
Section: Continuum Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disadvantage makes the FEM less efficient than the boundary element method (BEM) in dealing with fracture problems (Datas, 2020;Jing, 2003) The boundaries of the continuum are discretised only in the boundary element method (BEM), whereas the complete domain needs to be discretized in the FDM and FEM methods (Jing and Hudson, 2002;Manouchehrian et al, 2012). In addition, there is no artificial boundaries are required where the common problems in geomechanics are the extended medium to infinity, while the artificial boundaries are required in both FDM and FEM methods (Fahmy, 2021;Mesquita and Pavanello, 2005). BEMs are especially convenient to address the static continuum problems with small boundary to volume ratios, with stress and elastic behaviour or displacements implemented to the boundaries (Gao, 2003).…”
Section: Continuum Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So many attempts have been made to include radiation damping into FEM schemes presenting finite meshes. Examples of these strategies are in the inclusion of "Infinite Elements", the development of Dirichlet to Newman (DtN) and of Perfectly Matched Layers (PML) schemes to model the unbounded, wave propagating domain (Mesquita and Pavanello, 2005;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take full advantage of these properties the BEM must be formulated using an auxiliary state (a fundamental solution, a Green's function or similar state) that satisfies simultaneously the operator under analysis and the Sommerfeld radiation condition. An account of the main currently available strategies to perform the dynamic analysis of unbounded domains may be found in Mesquita and Pavanello [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%