2008
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/5/055012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical methods for experimental design of large-scale linear ill-posed inverse problems

Abstract: While an experimental design for well-posed inverse linear problems has been well studied, covering a vast range of well-established design criteria and optimization algorithms, its ill-posed counterpart is a rather new topic. The ill-posed nature of the problem entails the incorporation of regularization techniques. The consequent non-stochastic error introduced by regularization needs to be taken into account when choosing an experimental design criterion. We discuss different ways to define an optimal desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
195
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For underdetermined problems, the convex relaxed l 1 -norm problem provably finds a near-optimal solution also with respect to l 0 , i.e., the sparsest solution [4,11,12]; we refer to [29] for an overview of numerical methods employed in this context. In a different interpretation of the sparsity approach, the authors in [15] find optimal experimental designs for linear inverse problems. Here, a sparsity term is used to rule out experiments that do not contribute significant information for the inversion.…”
Section: Introduction Optimal Control Problems With Control Costs Of Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For underdetermined problems, the convex relaxed l 1 -norm problem provably finds a near-optimal solution also with respect to l 0 , i.e., the sparsest solution [4,11,12]; we refer to [29] for an overview of numerical methods employed in this context. In a different interpretation of the sparsity approach, the authors in [15] find optimal experimental designs for linear inverse problems. Here, a sparsity term is used to rule out experiments that do not contribute significant information for the inversion.…”
Section: Introduction Optimal Control Problems With Control Costs Of Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth remarking that our approach of improving the prior based on the statistics of the ground-truth is different from recent approaches that optimise the prior based on the denoising result [9,16,15,4,6]. These approaches can provide improved results in practise, but no longer have the simple MAP interpretation.…”
Section: Image Statistics and The Jump Partmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other than recent numerous exceptions (see [8,5,12,15,9,14] and references therein), optimal experimental design of ill-posed problems has been somewhat an under-researched topic. In the case of ill-posed problems, the selection of optimal weights for (8) is more difficult because this estimate is biased and its bias depends on the unknown m: bias( m) = −λ 2 C(w) −1 M m, where the inverse Fisher matrix is given by…”
Section: The Ill-posed Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, let us return to the well-posed parameter estimation example with Aj = SL −1 Qj. The penalized least-squares estimate (8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%