2006
DOI: 10.1080/13504860600839964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Methods and Volatility Models for Valuing Cliquet Options

Abstract: Several numerical issues for valuing cliquet options using PDE methods are investigated. The use of a running sum of returns formulation is compared to an average return formulation. Methods for grid construction, interpolation of jump conditions, and application of boundary conditions are compared. The effect of various volatility modelling assumptions on the value of cliquet options is also studied. Numerical results are reported for jump diffusion models, calibrated volatility surface models, and uncertain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For σ = 0.2 we will compare 1. the singular point method with maximal level of error in each observation period h = 10 −6 (SP); 2. the pure binomial method (BIN); For the first two methods we choose different time steps m = 200, 500, 1,000, 2,000 in every observation period. In the case of FD method we report the values obtained in Windcliff et al (2006) with different numbers of nodes and time steps. Moreover, in order to test the efficiency of the approximation of the continuous value, we also provide the price obtained by using Monte Carlo method with 1.000.000 of trials (hence with very long computation time).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For σ = 0.2 we will compare 1. the singular point method with maximal level of error in each observation period h = 10 −6 (SP); 2. the pure binomial method (BIN); For the first two methods we choose different time steps m = 200, 500, 1,000, 2,000 in every observation period. In the case of FD method we report the values obtained in Windcliff et al (2006) with different numbers of nodes and time steps. Moreover, in order to test the efficiency of the approximation of the continuous value, we also provide the price obtained by using Monte Carlo method with 1.000.000 of trials (hence with very long computation time).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use, in both cases, the standard cliquet contract studied in Wilmott (2002) and Windcliff et al (2006):…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for a given K j which results in the so-called repeated grids discussed in [13] and [14]. In this case, no interpolation is required to estimate V * .…”
Section: Analysis Of the Discrete Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%