The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical methods and comparison for computing dark and bright solitons in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simulate the time dependence of field configurations for computing bright soliton quantities we have used an efficient and accurate numerical method, the so-called time-splitting cosine pseudo-spectral finite difference method (TSCP) [9,10], in order to control the highly oscillatory phase background. This method allowed us to improve in several orders of magnitude the accuracy in the computations of the charges and anomalies presented in [5].…”
Section: Jhep05(2017)106mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the time dependence of field configurations for computing bright soliton quantities we have used an efficient and accurate numerical method, the so-called time-splitting cosine pseudo-spectral finite difference method (TSCP) [9,10], in order to control the highly oscillatory phase background. This method allowed us to improve in several orders of magnitude the accuracy in the computations of the charges and anomalies presented in [5].…”
Section: Jhep05(2017)106mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spectral finite difference (TSCP) and the time-splitting finite difference with transformation (TSFD-T) methods [16,17] will be made in order to control the highly oscillatory phase background. In fact, these methods allowed us to improve in several orders of magnitude the accuracy in the computation of the charges and anomalies presented in [4].…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the boundary condition (4.1) is satisfied for each time step. In our numerical simulations we will use the so-called time-splitting cosine pseudo-spectral finite difference (TSCP) and the time-splitting finite difference with transformation (TSFD-T) methods [16,17] for k = 0 and k = 0, respectively. Our numerical simulations reproduce the main properties already known for dark soliton interactions in the integrable defocusing NLS model.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an additional example to test the MSD boundary condition, we simulate two equal-charge vortices whose interaction is known to produce a rotating circular motion of the two vortices orbiting each other [11,33,44,45]. Using a fixed grid size of 171 × 171, the simulations are run for long times using the L0 and MSD boundary conditions.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Dark Vortices In the Nlsementioning
confidence: 99%