2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2004.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical local-potential-averaging method for quantum mechanical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work, we showed that the deterioration of numerical accuracy caused by the large sampling interval can be minimized by the local potential averaging (LPA) method, 29 which uses instead of Eq. (8)…”
Section: Partial Local Potential Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we showed that the deterioration of numerical accuracy caused by the large sampling interval can be minimized by the local potential averaging (LPA) method, 29 which uses instead of Eq. (8)…”
Section: Partial Local Potential Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenstate analysis method using the time-independent Schro ¨dinger equation and the quantum transport simulation method using the Wigner transport equation (WTE) 1) based on the Wigner distribution function (WDF) have been used widely for the precise analysis of nanosize structure and device characteristics. The latter, which is often considered as a quantum mechanical analogy of the classical Boltzmann equation, has attracted many researchers' attention in the last two decades [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] because it can deal with devices having open boundaries. Recently, the author has formulated a new discrete WTE 17) in which a mutually independent discretization scheme for the diagonal and cross-diagonal coordinates of the density operator can be employed and has showed that the new discretization scheme results in a numerically highly effective discrete WTE that requires much less computational resources without a significant loss in accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%