2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5127616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation on influence of mounting baffles in solar stills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several inventive methods, such as utilizing different absorber materials (Arunkumar et al, 2018, including thermal energy storage Hasan, 2019, Sakthivel andArjunan, 2019), varying the cover tilt angle (Cherraye et al 2020. Azooz and Younis, 2016, Dev and Tiwari, 2009, adding external condensers (Hassan et al 2020, Al-Hamadani andShukla, 2013), adding features to increase the absorption area El-Sabaii andEl-Naggar, 2017, El-Sabaii et al, 2015), using fins within the enclosure (Subhani andKumar, 2019, El-Sabaii et al, 2000) and using mirrors to increase the incident radiation (Karimi Estahbanati et al, 2016, Tanaka, 2009 have all been examined. Given this extensive body of literature, the area has also been the subject of research reviews describing the different parameters that influence the performance of single slope solar stills (Pachal andPatel, 2017, Sharshir et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several inventive methods, such as utilizing different absorber materials (Arunkumar et al, 2018, including thermal energy storage Hasan, 2019, Sakthivel andArjunan, 2019), varying the cover tilt angle (Cherraye et al 2020. Azooz and Younis, 2016, Dev and Tiwari, 2009, adding external condensers (Hassan et al 2020, Al-Hamadani andShukla, 2013), adding features to increase the absorption area El-Sabaii andEl-Naggar, 2017, El-Sabaii et al, 2015), using fins within the enclosure (Subhani andKumar, 2019, El-Sabaii et al, 2000) and using mirrors to increase the incident radiation (Karimi Estahbanati et al, 2016, Tanaka, 2009 have all been examined. Given this extensive body of literature, the area has also been the subject of research reviews describing the different parameters that influence the performance of single slope solar stills (Pachal andPatel, 2017, Sharshir et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent attempt, Subhani and Kumar (2019) numerically investigated the effect of baffles on the performance of a single slope solar still with a fixed cover angle. The study found that in some cases, mounting a baffle supresses natural convection inside the geometry which leads to a deterioration of the fluid flow resulting in a lower heat transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irfan Ali et al [12] numerically analyzed and modeled solar still in MATLAB and studied the performance of the still by mixing water with granular activated carbon and concluded the enhancement of efficiency. S Subhani et al [13] numerically analyzed the performance of the solar still by incorporating the baffles on the evaporating surface and by varying its position on it, hence concluded that the performance of the still is effectively improved with fewer fluctuations when the baffle is at 1/2nd position from the left wall. Although the enhanced performance of the stepped solar still is studied the rate of heat transfer and the flow structure can be further analyzed along with the comparison by adding furthermore several steps in the basin of the still.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shubhani and Senthil Kumar18 modified the conventional single-slope solar still by mounting a baffle of a given height at three different positions(1/3rd, 1/2nd, and 2/3rd of the length of the base) and observed it in the constant operating temperature difference of 10 C (range: 30-70 C) as well as variable operating temperature difference (range: 5-25 C). An increase in multiple vortices formation and enhancement of convective heat transfer was noted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esfe et al21 added a fan with a heat sink in a conventional solar still with a length of 0.438 m, a large height of 0.187 m, and a small height F I G U R E 5 Velocity contours (a) CFD simulation, (b) experiment 18. of 0.075 m. The mounting angle of the glass was taken as 30 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%