2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of water droplet dynamics in a low-temperature fuel cell microchannel: Effect of channel geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At low operating temperatures (25°C) and ambient pressure, they observed that the parallel flow field was the most unsuitable flow field design for water removal, resulting in the worst performance of the PEM fuel cell. In a study by Zhu et al [31], the effect of micro-channel geometry on water droplet dynamics in a PEM fuel cell using a 3-D VOF model, was investigated. They compared many different micro-channel designs; rectangular, trapezoid, upside down trapezoid, triangular, rectangular with curved bottom wall and semicircular with respect to evolution and motion of the droplets, flow resistance, saturation and coverage ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low operating temperatures (25°C) and ambient pressure, they observed that the parallel flow field was the most unsuitable flow field design for water removal, resulting in the worst performance of the PEM fuel cell. In a study by Zhu et al [31], the effect of micro-channel geometry on water droplet dynamics in a PEM fuel cell using a 3-D VOF model, was investigated. They compared many different micro-channel designs; rectangular, trapezoid, upside down trapezoid, triangular, rectangular with curved bottom wall and semicircular with respect to evolution and motion of the droplets, flow resistance, saturation and coverage ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiao et al [18] studied water transport in a fuel cell stack with serpentine flow channel layout and pointed out that water was not evenly distributed in the flow channel, which could cause the reactant gas distribution and fuel cell performance deviation among fuel cells. Water transport and removal in the flow channel with various channel cross section shapes was analyzed by Zhu et al [19] and in the GDL with various designs by Park et al [20] and Yin et al [21]. Using the same approach, Cai et al [22] investigated the channel/MEA surface wettability (static contact angle) on water transport and found that water droplet was transported faster on a more hydrophobic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many factors affecting the water transport characteristics in the GCs, the design of cross-sectional geometry is also found to be important based on experimental and numerical investigations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Applying the neutron radiography method to operating PEM fuel cells, Owejan et al [8] compared the volume of accumulated water in the GCs between rectangular and triangular cross-sectional geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%