2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of tsunami wave impacts on different coastal bridge decks using immersed boundary method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qu et al (2020) numerically investigated the effects of floating breakwater on the cnoidal wave induced wave loads on the low-lying bridge deck using REEF3D. Zhao et al (2020a) developed a numerical tank for generating tsunami-like waves recorded in the Iwate station during 2011 Japan tsunami and studied the wave impact on coastal bridges by using the Immersed Boundary method (IBM). Xu et al (2020) presented a methodology for sequentially updating surrogate models with augmented data in order to substantially enhance the design of experiments in the bridge deck-wave interaction under solitary wave actions.…”
Section: Low-rise Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qu et al (2020) numerically investigated the effects of floating breakwater on the cnoidal wave induced wave loads on the low-lying bridge deck using REEF3D. Zhao et al (2020a) developed a numerical tank for generating tsunami-like waves recorded in the Iwate station during 2011 Japan tsunami and studied the wave impact on coastal bridges by using the Immersed Boundary method (IBM). Xu et al (2020) presented a methodology for sequentially updating surrogate models with augmented data in order to substantially enhance the design of experiments in the bridge deck-wave interaction under solitary wave actions.…”
Section: Low-rise Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is essential to study the countermeasure to protect the coastal bridge decks. As shown in Table 4, the strategies for protecting the bridge deck including the studies of air vents in the bridge deck (e.g., Bozorgnia et al 2010;Azadbakht 2013;Hayatdavoodi et al 2014;Xu et al 2016;Xiao and Guo 2018;Zhao et al 2020aZhao et al , 2020b, the height of shear keys (e.g., Chen et al 2016), the connection between the superstructures and substructures (e.g., Xu and Cai 2015;Balomenos and Padgett 2018;Cai et al 2018;Yuan et al 2018), the offshore submerged breakwater (e.g., Wei and Dalrymple 2016), the offshore floating breakwater (e.g., Qu et al 2020a) and so on. Figure 8 gives a design of air vent distributed on the slab and the corresponding airflow field induced by the incident wave.…”
Section: Countermeasuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the incident wave directly hits the elevated bridge deck, wave breaking occurs, resulting in wave overtopping above the deck surface and air bubbles forming in the water. The conventional potential flow method faces a difficult challenge in accurately predicting the highly nonlinear wave-deck interaction, and such cases are best studied by the use of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers regardless of the submerged or elevated condition of the bridge deck (e.g., Huang and Xiao 2009;Bozorgnia et al 2010;Xiao et al 2010;Jin and Meng 2011;Bricker et al 2012;Bozorgnia and Lee 2012;Yim and Azadbakht 2013;Azadbakht 2013;Azadbakht and Yim 2014;Hayatdavoodi et al 2014;Xu and Cai 2014;Ataei and Padgett 2014;Seiffert et al 2015;Xu and Cai 2015;Xu and Cai 2015;Chen et al 2016;Xu et al 2018a;Xu et al 2018b;Xiao and Guo 2018;Huang, Yang, et al, 2019;Istrati and Buckle 2019;Qu et al 2019;Moideen et al 2019;Montoya et al 2019;Greco et al 2020;Hu et al 2020;Qu et al 2020a;Qu et al 2020b;Xiang et al 2020;Yang et al 2020;Zhao et al 2020aZhao et al , 2020bZhu and Dong 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cylindrical shape of the buoy hull has enough interior room for technical equipment and allow easy accessibility for maintenance ( Fig. 3a) [20]. A cabin made of fiber reinforced polymer/plastic (FRP) is embedded in the middle of the buoy hull ( Fig.…”
Section: A Buoy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%