2013
DOI: 10.5516/net.03.2012.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of the Spreading and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Ex-Vessel Core Melt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, strides have been made in the use of commercial CFD codes to analyze core debris spreading behavior. [26] Effects accounted for in this approach include radiation heat transfer, decay heat, and temperaturedependent viscosity. However, crusting behavior and the potential for concrete decomposition and ablation are not modeled.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, strides have been made in the use of commercial CFD codes to analyze core debris spreading behavior. [26] Effects accounted for in this approach include radiation heat transfer, decay heat, and temperaturedependent viscosity. However, crusting behavior and the potential for concrete decomposition and ablation are not modeled.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the other methods described above, this approach is computationally intensive and so the ability to apply this method to longer term transients at reactor scale is limited. [26] Following closure of the Mark I issue, MELTSPREAD development ceased in the early 1990's, at which time the melt spreading database upon which the code had been originally validated was rather limited. In particular, the database used for initial validation consisted of: i) comparison to an analytical solution for the dam break problem, [27] iii) water spreading tests in a 1/10 linear scale model of the Mark I containment by Theofanous et al, [5] and iii) steel spreading tests by Suzuki et al [28] that were also conducted in a Mark I type geometry.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, strides have been made in the use of commercial CFD codes to analyze core debris spreading behavior. [26] Effects accounted for in this approach include radiation heat transfer, decay heat, temperature-dependent viscosity. However, crusting behavior and the potential for concrete decomposition and ablation are not modeled.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the other methods described above, this approach is computationally intensive and so the ability to apply this method to longer term transients is limited. [26] Following closure of the Mark I issue, MELTSPREAD development ceased in the early 1990's, at which time the melt spreading database upon which the code had been originally validated was rather limited. In particular, the database used for initial validation consisted of: i) comparison to an analytical solution for the dam break problem, [27] iii) water spreading tests in a 1/10 linear scale model of the Mark I containment by Theofanous et al, [6] and iii) steel spreading tests by Suzuki et al [28] that were also conducted in a Mark I type geometry.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittmaack, [28] used the experimental data to compare and verify this code and then used it to model the spreading and flow of molten corium. Ye et al, [23] used a commercial code (FLUENT) to model molten corium spreading utilizing the Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) technique for the different phases. They specified the thermaldependent properties of the molten corium using user-defined functions in the solver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%