Numerical investigation of the high-speed conical flow past a sharp fin

Abstract

The supersonic flow past a fin mounted on a flat plate is simulated numerically by solving the Reynolds averaged Navier—Stokes equations. The results agree well with the experimental data. Post-processing of the numerical solution provides the missing flow-field evidence for confirming the currently accepted flow model, whose conception was based mainly on surface data. It is found that the flow is dominated by a large vortical structure, which lies on the plate and whose core has a remarkably conical shape with flattened elliptical cross-section. Along the fin and close to the corner, a slowly growing smaller vortex develops. On top of the conical vortex and along it a λ-shock is formed. Quantitative data are presented, which show that the flow is not actually purely conical but a small deviation exists, especially at the part between the separation shock and the plate. This deviation is detected when the stream wise extent of the flow is more than 20–30 initial boundary-layer thicknesses. Owing to the rather quasi-conical nature of the flow, the various flow variables do not remain constant along rays that start at the origin of the conical flow field, but they vary slowly. Data are presented which support the view that this deviation from conical behaviour is mainly due to the effect of the smaller rate of development of the boundary later of the plate, compared to the conical vortex.

Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions

“…Clear 3-D images of the swept shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction were provided by Panaras [150], who calculated a M ∞ = 3.0, α = 20…”

“…Fig. 58 from Panaras [150] includes all the critical elements of the swept shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction. The vortices that are expected to appear in this type of flow are visualized in the 3-D space by the contours of the eigenvalues of the velocity gradient field.…”

“…Then the question arises, what causes this deviation? In this context Panaras [150] observes that the different rate of thickening of the conical vortex and of the boundary layer of the plate is expected to affect the conical similarity adversely. For studying this effect Panaras [150] projected conically the sections (i) and (ii) shown in Fig.…”

Investigation of Three-Dimensional Shock Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction Initiated by a Single Fin

“…The flow configuration and its computational domain are sketched in Figure 1. The computational domain in the present study only contains the compression side of the fin, where the 3D SWTBLI happens, and the other side of the fin is discarded to simplify the simulation, consistent with other numerical simulations found in literature [40][41][42] . The The mesh was generated based on the criterion proposed by Sagaut [43] for LES of boundary layer flows, known as ∆!…”

Turbulence Modeling of Flows with Extensive Crossflow Separation

“…Picture taken by H. Werle (ONERA) in a water-tank; (b) Swept shock/boundary layer interaction in a fin/plate configuration. The quasi-conical separation vortex is visualized by the contours of the eigenvalues of the velocity gradient field [1].…”