2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of the combined effect of forced and free thermal convection in synthetic groundwater basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the calculations, Darcy's equation and the Fourier-Kirchhoff equation were coupled and solved without source/sink, the fluid was incompressible and isothermic, and gravitational acceleration and dynamic viscosity were kept as constant. The study was stationary because of the relatively shallow (thickness: ~ 300 m, length: 17 km) model domain and thus the temperature difference between the boundaries, presumably the water table variation (large hydraulic head gradient) is the main driving force of fluid flow demonstrated by Szijártó et al (2019). Consequently, only conduction and advection (forced convection) were taken into account.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the calculations, Darcy's equation and the Fourier-Kirchhoff equation were coupled and solved without source/sink, the fluid was incompressible and isothermic, and gravitational acceleration and dynamic viscosity were kept as constant. The study was stationary because of the relatively shallow (thickness: ~ 300 m, length: 17 km) model domain and thus the temperature difference between the boundaries, presumably the water table variation (large hydraulic head gradient) is the main driving force of fluid flow demonstrated by Szijártó et al (2019). Consequently, only conduction and advection (forced convection) were taken into account.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the coupled flux and heat modeling analyses are consistent with previous studies in other areas of the world. Groundwater flow on the basin scale is controlled by numerous factors: the configuration of the water table [35][36][37][40][41][42], the effects of temperature on fluid density and viscosity in heterogeneous anisotropic media [37,43], the effect of hydraulic conductivity contrasts and temperature boundaries [44], the three-dimensional flow field with the variations and areal distribution of heat affected by relief on the water table and permeability variations [37,45], advective heat transfer [29,30,42,45,46], temperature distributions for paleoflow systems [47,48], the modeling of heat as a groundwater tracer [49] and of large-scale flow [38], and the significance of basin asymmetry and geothermal assessments [36,37,50], among many others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual model of flow is based on the groundwater conditions in the IB described in the previous section and the following considerations: (1) the flow system is gravity driven; (2) on the basin scale, there is a dynamic equilibrium between inputs and outputs, so the flow system can approximate a steady-state flow field; (3) K is homogeneous in each hydrogeological unit with main directions aligned with the coordinate axis, though anisotropic; (4) on a regional scale, fractured media can be estimated by equivalent porous media; (5) the water table in the mountains cannot be consistently higher than the topography; (6) its elevation cannot be too low either because this would be inconsistent with the existence of some springs or due to the position of the historical water table; (7) the flow at the boundary cannot be greater than the existing precipitation ranges [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]; and (8) in the scenarios in which the numerical analysis of coupled flow-heat transport processes is carried out, the role of topography in heat transport is considered in addition to the above assumptions [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Conceptual Model Of Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems typically consisted of local, intermediate, and regional groundwater flow systems and are thought to exist in many hydrogeological environments, including endorheic basins (Figure 1a), coastal aquifers ( Figure 1b) (Wilson, 2005), hyporheic zones (Boano et al, 2014), and river basins (Zlotnik et al, 2011). Groundwater flow systems mediate a variety of geological, geophysical, and biogeochemical processes in both shallow and deep underground environments (Garven, 1995;Person et al, 1996;Schwartz & Domenico, 1973;Stuyfzand, 1999;Szijártó et al, 2019;Tóth, 1999). Understanding such groundwater flow systems is of great practical relevance to ore mineralization (Garven et al, 1993(Garven et al, , 1999Garven & Freeze, 1984;Raffensperger & Garven, 1995), petroleum migration (Garven, 1989), sediment diagenesis (Lee & Bethke, 1994), heat transfer (Szijártó et al, 2019), hydrochemical patterns (Gupta et al, 2015;Jiang et al, 2014;Stuyfzand, 1999;Wang et al, 2015), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater flow systems mediate a variety of geological, geophysical, and biogeochemical processes in both shallow and deep underground environments (Garven, 1995; Person et al, 1996; Schwartz & Domenico, 1973; Stuyfzand, 1999; Szijártó et al, 2019; Tóth, 1999). Understanding such groundwater flow systems is of great practical relevance to ore mineralization (Garven et al, 1993, 1999; Garven & Freeze, 1984; Raffensperger & Garven, 1995), petroleum migration (Garven, 1989), sediment diagenesis (Lee & Bethke, 1994), heat transfer (Szijártó et al, 2019), hydrochemical patterns (Gupta et al, 2015; Jiang et al, 2014; Stuyfzand, 1999; Wang et al, 2015), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%