2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40996-021-00745-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Reinforced Concrete and Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Exterior Beam-Column Joints under Cyclic Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shell element shell181, the solid element solid185, and the link element link8 are, respectively, adopted for simulating the steel structure, the concrete, and the prestressed reinforcement in the finite element model; the steel plate is mainly divided into rectangular grids, while the solid concrete is divided into hexahedral grids to ensure the calculation accuracy. The initial strain theory is employed for applying the prestress [18][19][20], and initial strain is set up for link8. In this paper, due to the complex model and large size, the entire structure is divided into 785 one-dimensional elements, 5,13,437 two-dimensional elements, and 1,191,776 three-dimensional solid elements.…”
Section: Element Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shell element shell181, the solid element solid185, and the link element link8 are, respectively, adopted for simulating the steel structure, the concrete, and the prestressed reinforcement in the finite element model; the steel plate is mainly divided into rectangular grids, while the solid concrete is divided into hexahedral grids to ensure the calculation accuracy. The initial strain theory is employed for applying the prestress [18][19][20], and initial strain is set up for link8. In this paper, due to the complex model and large size, the entire structure is divided into 785 one-dimensional elements, 5,13,437 two-dimensional elements, and 1,191,776 three-dimensional solid elements.…”
Section: Element Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [1,2] Deep beams, pile tops, dapped terminating beams, and corbels are examples of nonlinear and nonprismatic members that are not covered by the conventional beam theory based on Bernoulli's theorem. Because shear failure is more common than fexural failure, these structures cannot be analyzed or built using fexural analysis of beam theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high computational cost of nonlinear analysis of RC structures, especially for fine mesh sizes between 25 mm and 12.5 mm [32][33][34], many researchers [35][36][37][38][39][40] successfully obtain the detailed behaviors of different structural elements tested under cyclic loading (i.e., load-displacement backbone curves, cracking patterns, yielding in reinforcement bars) by adopting monotonic loads through the CDP model. On the other side, several researchers [41][42][43][44][45][46] failed to obtain the cyclic characteristics of different structural responses for elements modeled via CDP even at a 30 mm mesh element size [47]. As a result, monotonic loading is typically preferred over cyclic loading when using the CDP model due to the absence of shear retention, which can lead to improper capture of the pinching behavior during load cycles in shear-dominated scenarios [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%