2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of particle transport and inhalation using standing thermal manikins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dygert et al (2009) indicated that the strength of the thermal plume is relatively insensitive to the temperature distribution on the human body surface, as long as the area-weighted average temperature on the human body surface is the same. Existing human simulation usually assigned a uniform temperature to the body surface in numerical simulation, and the body surface temperature ranged from 28℃ to 33.7℃ (Murakami et al 1999;Jakie et al 2010;Zhang et al 2011;Salmanzadeh et al 2012;Li et al 2013). Jackie et al (2010) calculated the intake fraction (iF) in the indoor environment when the body surface was fixed at 32℃ and 28℃ and found that a 4℃ change in body surface temperature influenced the intake fraction by less than 10%.…”
Section: Investigated Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dygert et al (2009) indicated that the strength of the thermal plume is relatively insensitive to the temperature distribution on the human body surface, as long as the area-weighted average temperature on the human body surface is the same. Existing human simulation usually assigned a uniform temperature to the body surface in numerical simulation, and the body surface temperature ranged from 28℃ to 33.7℃ (Murakami et al 1999;Jakie et al 2010;Zhang et al 2011;Salmanzadeh et al 2012;Li et al 2013). Jackie et al (2010) calculated the intake fraction (iF) in the indoor environment when the body surface was fixed at 32℃ and 28℃ and found that a 4℃ change in body surface temperature influenced the intake fraction by less than 10%.…”
Section: Investigated Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interaction would not only change the local airflow distribution in the vicinity of the human body, but certainly affect the local evaporation factors (air pressure, temperature and etc.). It was proved by the previous studies that even small changes of the local airflow would cause very different transport trajectories of the particles and droplets [7,20]. Most importantly, since the ascending thermal plume was capable of carrying contaminants from the near-floor level into the breathing zone [22], the inhalability and infection risks could be significantly enlarged after considering the human body thermal effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When individual coughs, the size of the expelled droplets could be diversely ranged from 0.1 μm to 1000 μm [4][5][6], which is wide enough to cause both viral and bacterial infections [5]. Also, such a wide size range implies that the transport and dispersion of the droplets could be completely different [7] after expelling through the same cough. Unlike the large droplets that would quickly deposit to the floor due to high inertia and mass, small droplets would be easily carried by the local airflow and tend to suspend in the air for longer time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common estimation of the droplet density and initial concentration of non-volatile compounds is ρ nv = 1000 kg/m 3 and C nv = 1.8% [8], which results in an equilibrium diameter of d d,e = 0.262d d,0 . This means that as water evaporates, some free-falling large droplets could become airborne [10], leading to an elevated number density of inhalable droplets in the breathing zone and an increased probability of infection [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%