Numerical investigation of multi-nozzle ejector device with inclined nozzles for marine gas turbine

Abstract

The high-temperature exhaust gases and the hot surfaces of the ejector device in marine gas turbines generate significant levels of infrared radiation. An appropriate nozzle structure can effectively lower the exhaust gas temperature and reduce the high-temperature radiation surface area, thereby minimizing external infrared radiation. In this study, a numerical simulation of the nozzle structure in the ejector device was conducted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods. By investigating the orthogonal combinations of nozzle inclination angles and the number of nozzles, the temperature distribution and flow characteristics under different operating conditions were analysed. The results showed that as the nozzle inclination angle increased, the entrainment coefficient (Ce) and the temperature ratio at the inlet and outlet (Rt) initially improved but then worsened. Simultaneously, the pressure loss coefficient (Cpl) increased with the inclination angle. The CRITIC weight method was employed to objectively allocate weights to Rt, Ce, and Cpl, determining the optimal solution. The results indicated that Rt and Cpl had significant and similar weights. The optimal solution was found in Case 10 (α = 5°, x = 4), with corresponding evaluation indices of Ce=2.38, Cpl=11.45, and =0.68. This study's findings are of great importance for enhancing the performance of marine gas turbines and reducing external infrared radiation.

Optimization of exhaust ejector with lobed nozzle for marine gas turbine

“…The strength of FLUENT in simulating turbulent lies in its provision of a multitude of advanced turbulence models and solution algorithms, coupled with its powerful parallel computing capabilities, which together ensure the precision and efficiency of the simulations. In this study, the pressure-based solver of FLUENT [32], with the coupling solution of velocity and pressure is achieved through the SIMPLE algorithm [33]. The inlet and outlet boundary conditions are specified as outlined in Table 1.…”