2012
DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2012.676182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of Magnus effect on dimpled spheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the golf ball, the lift force is slightly smaller at the supercritical Reynolds number when compared to the subcritical Reynolds number, whereas for the smooth sphere, the supercritical lift force is approximately twice as large as the subcritical lift force, as also evidenced in Table 1 . On the other hand, in the golf ball case, Beratlis et al [ 7 ] mentioned in their numerical results that “the maximum lift obtained in the beginning of the supercritical regime is higher than that in the subcritical regime”, and the trend is reversed to our results. The possible explanation of this qualitative disagreement comes from the difference of critical Reynolds number between these two cases (around 8 × 10 4 in our case and 5 × 10 4 in [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the golf ball, the lift force is slightly smaller at the supercritical Reynolds number when compared to the subcritical Reynolds number, whereas for the smooth sphere, the supercritical lift force is approximately twice as large as the subcritical lift force, as also evidenced in Table 1 . On the other hand, in the golf ball case, Beratlis et al [ 7 ] mentioned in their numerical results that “the maximum lift obtained in the beginning of the supercritical regime is higher than that in the subcritical regime”, and the trend is reversed to our results. The possible explanation of this qualitative disagreement comes from the difference of critical Reynolds number between these two cases (around 8 × 10 4 in our case and 5 × 10 4 in [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Beratlis et al [ 7 ] extended the work of Smith et al [ 3 ] to the investigation of flow past rotating golf balls. They conducted the direct numerical simulations of the rotating golf ball with the same spin parameter at four different Reynolds numbers spanning from the subcritical regime to the supercritical regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particular attention will be focused towards how the dimples affect the generation of lift force under self-rotating conditions. The mechanism of the inverse Magnus effect on the golf ball [1,25] and its comparison with the smooth sphere will be investigated in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a staggered grid was also helpful in decreasing the number of singularities, since the azimuthal and axial velocity components, as well as pressure, are not defined at r = 0 for such grid. More details about axis treatment are discussed by Akselvoll & Moin (1996) and Verzicco & Orlandi (1996), while applications of our cylindrical coordinate solver can be found in Smith et al (2010), Posa et al (2011), Beratlis, Squires & Balaras (2012), , Balaras, Schroeder & Posa (2015) and Posa, Lippolis & Balaras (2015). All spatial derivatives are approximated with second-order central differences.…”
Section: Methodologies and Computational Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%