2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of axisymmetric intake flowfield and performance for scramjet-powered ascent flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fujio and Ogawa [16] presented a multi-objective design optimization based on deep learning to predict flowfields inside scramjet intakes that could replace CFD simulations. Posteriorly, results of recent researches demonstrated that higher compression efficiency can be achieved at lower Mach number while total pressure losses can be minimized at higher Mach numbers and altitude [17,18]. Despite these dispositions achieve the thermodynamic condition sufficiently adequate to fuel self-ignition condition [14,17,18] a disadvantage of these configurations is the need of more longer scramjet lengths to accommodate conical shock wave structures, which are positioned closest to wall surfaces at high Mach numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fujio and Ogawa [16] presented a multi-objective design optimization based on deep learning to predict flowfields inside scramjet intakes that could replace CFD simulations. Posteriorly, results of recent researches demonstrated that higher compression efficiency can be achieved at lower Mach number while total pressure losses can be minimized at higher Mach numbers and altitude [17,18]. Despite these dispositions achieve the thermodynamic condition sufficiently adequate to fuel self-ignition condition [14,17,18] a disadvantage of these configurations is the need of more longer scramjet lengths to accommodate conical shock wave structures, which are positioned closest to wall surfaces at high Mach numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posteriorly, results of recent researches demonstrated that higher compression efficiency can be achieved at lower Mach number while total pressure losses can be minimized at higher Mach numbers and altitude [17,18]. Despite these dispositions achieve the thermodynamic condition sufficiently adequate to fuel self-ignition condition [14,17,18] a disadvantage of these configurations is the need of more longer scramjet lengths to accommodate conical shock wave structures, which are positioned closest to wall surfaces at high Mach numbers. Based on this, more studies are needed to elucidate the main flow phenomena in other alternatives of internal compression systems, and consequently, define the best geometry for scramjet engines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation