All Days 2008
DOI: 10.2118/116255-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms in the Solution of Transient Flow Problems With Discontinuities

Abstract: Laplace transformation provides advantages in the solution of many pressure-transient analysis problems. Usually, these applications lead to a solution that needs to be inverted numerically to the real-time domain. The algorithm presented by Stehfest in 1970 is the most common tool in petroleum engineering for the numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. This algorithm, however, is only applicable to continuous functions and this limitation precludes its use for a wide variety of problems of practical intere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A deconvolution procedure filtered out variations of flow rate and provided an equivalent constant rate pumping response of the reservoir (i.e., normalized response to a unit rate), which improved the interpretation (Gringarten, 2008). Among the different available algorithms (e.g., von Schroeter et al, 2004;Levitan, 2005;Al-Ajmi et al, 2008;Pimonov et al, 2009;Ahmadi et al, 2012), the deconvolution procedure in Laplace space proposed by Al-Ajmi et al (2008) was used for convenience. In Laplace domain, the deconvolution of two functions becomes the division of their transforms, and therefore the deconvolution of the pressure response, p r (p), to the variable flow rate, q(p), is simply (Bourgeois and Horne, 1993;Al-Ajmi et al, 2008;Ahmadi et al, 2012):…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deconvolution procedure filtered out variations of flow rate and provided an equivalent constant rate pumping response of the reservoir (i.e., normalized response to a unit rate), which improved the interpretation (Gringarten, 2008). Among the different available algorithms (e.g., von Schroeter et al, 2004;Levitan, 2005;Al-Ajmi et al, 2008;Pimonov et al, 2009;Ahmadi et al, 2012), the deconvolution procedure in Laplace space proposed by Al-Ajmi et al (2008) was used for convenience. In Laplace domain, the deconvolution of two functions becomes the division of their transforms, and therefore the deconvolution of the pressure response, p r (p), to the variable flow rate, q(p), is simply (Bourgeois and Horne, 1993;Al-Ajmi et al, 2008;Ahmadi et al, 2012):…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Solutions of the Mathematical Models. The solutions of the mathematical models [23,24] at various outer boundary conditions can be obtained by applying source function and integral transform and taking the Laplace transform to with respect to . For gas reservoir with closed outer boundary in vertical direction and infinite outer boundary in horizontal direction, according to (1), (2), (3), (4), and (7), the dimensionless bottomhole pseudopressure of horizontal gas well in the Laplace space can be obtained.…”
Section: The Mathematical Model With Considering the Effect Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these cases, we suggest the use of the algorithm proposed by Roumboutsos and Stewart (1983) to obtain the Laplace transform of the sampled data and the numerical Laplace inversion algorithm proposed by Iseger (2006) for discontinuous functions. Al-Ajmi et al (2008) provides a discussion of the numerical inversion of discontinuous functions resulting from step-rate changes.…”
Section: Production Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%