2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1859603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Formats within Risk Disclosures and the Moderating Effect of Investors’ Disclosure Management Concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rupar (2011, 2015) did not find the significant three-way interaction predicted. Nelson and Rupar (2015) report mean risk assessments that are averaged across the low-and high-incentive conditions, whereas Nelson and Rupar (2011) report the mean risk assessments for each cell in the 2×2×2 design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rupar (2011, 2015) did not find the significant three-way interaction predicted. Nelson and Rupar (2015) report mean risk assessments that are averaged across the low-and high-incentive conditions, whereas Nelson and Rupar (2011) report the mean risk assessments for each cell in the 2×2×2 design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nelson and Rupar [2011] study whether investor risk assessment is affected by numerical disclosure versus percentage disclosure for potential downside risk. Nelson and Rupar [2011] find that numerical disclosure leads to higher risk assessment compared with percentage disclosure, but only when the disclosure format is mandatory rather than discretionary. Investors subconsciously anchor on the bigger number (compared with percentage) and therefore infer higher risk.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the disclosure format is mandated, investors perceive little room for managers to manipulate it and therefore are less vigilant to manager's strategic disclosure. In contrast, when the disclosure format is voluntary, investors are vigilant to managers' attempt to manipulate the disclosure format and therefore try to counteract the effect of this manipulation [Nelson and Rupar, 2011].…”
Section: Regulatory Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations