2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical examination of thermal bridging effects at the edges of vacuum-insulation-panels (VIP) in various constructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective thermal transmittance was estimated in consideration of heat transmittance of the EWP, the linear thermal transmittance of its slabs, and the linear thermal transmittance of the connection parts. It was also estimated in consideration of the size of the EWP, the area size for construction, and thermal bridge effects [34,35]. The difference between the effective thermal transmittance with multi-dimensional calculation-considered linear thermal transmittance and thermal transmittance with one-dimensional calculation is very high [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective thermal transmittance was estimated in consideration of heat transmittance of the EWP, the linear thermal transmittance of its slabs, and the linear thermal transmittance of the connection parts. It was also estimated in consideration of the size of the EWP, the area size for construction, and thermal bridge effects [34,35]. The difference between the effective thermal transmittance with multi-dimensional calculation-considered linear thermal transmittance and thermal transmittance with one-dimensional calculation is very high [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrier envelopes currently used for VIP encapsulation are produced by vacuum deposition of aluminium layers on top of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) films and lamination of up to three such films together with a polyethylene (PE) sealing film [1,5]. Due to their much lower thickness, the thermal bridge effect for vacuum deposited aluminium layers is significantly lower than for aluminium foils [13]. Laminates containing up to three metallized films can reach gas permeabilities down to 2-5 × 10 −15 m 3 (STP) m −2 day −1 Pa −1 at 23 • C and 50% RH and water vapour transmission rates of 1-5 × 10 −6 kg m −2 day −1 at 23 • C and 85% → 0% RH [1] and therefore can fulfil the barrier requirements for the building applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in thermal resistance in regular stud walls due to air leakage has been found to range from only 1 to 2% when airtight foam filled the whole cavity, to 20% when insulation was permeable for air and moisture, or a large unfilled air space existed in the cavity. This deviation may be even more pronounced in similar walls with VIPs as the relative effect of thermal bridges and other sources of unexpected heat losses can be much stronger than that of conventionally insulated walls [12]. Furthermore, the low permeance of the gas barrier membranes increases the risk of moisture accumulation in the wall and forces air and moisture toward defects in the wall and the edges of the panels [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%