Numerical Evaluation on Parametric Choices Influencing Segmentation Results in Radiology Images—A Multi-Dataset Study

Abstract

Medical image segmentation has gained greater attention over the past decade, especially in the field of image-guided surgery. Here, robust, accurate and fast segmentation tools are important for planning and navigation. In this work, we explore the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based approaches for multi-dataset segmentation from CT examinations. We hypothesize that selection of certain parameters in the network architecture design critically influence the segmentation results. We have employed two different CNN architectures, 3D-UNet and VGG-16, given that both networks are well accepted in the medical domain for segmentation tasks. In order to understand the efficiency of different parameter choices, we have adopted two different approaches. The first one combines different weight initialization schemes with different activation functions, whereas the second approach combines different weight initialization methods with a set of loss functions and optimizers. For evaluation, the 3D-UNet was trained with the Medical Segmentation Decathlon dataset and VGG-16 using LiTS data. The quality assessment done using eight quantitative metrics enhances the probability of using our proposed strategies for enhancing the segmentation results. Following a systematic approach in the evaluation of the results, we propose a few strategies that can be adopted for obtaining good segmentation results. Both of the architectures used in this work were selected on the basis of general acceptance in segmentation tasks for medical images based on their promising results compared to other state-of-the art networks. The highest Dice score obtained in 3D-UNet for the liver, pancreas and cardiac data was 0.897, 0.691 and 0.892. In the case of VGG-16, it was solely developed to work with liver data and delivered a Dice score of 0.921. From all the experiments conducted, we observed that two of the combinations with Xavier weight initialization (also known as Glorot), Adam optimiser, Cross Entropy loss (GloCEAdam) and LeCun weight initialization, cross entropy loss and Adam optimiser LecCEAdam worked best for most of the metrics in a 3D-UNet setting, while Xavier together with cross entropy loss and Tanh activation function (GloCEtanh) worked best for the VGG-16 network. Here, the parameter combinations are proposed on the basis of their contributions in obtaining optimal outcomes in segmentation evaluations. Moreover, we discuss that the preliminary evaluation results show that these parameters could later on be used for gaining more insights into model convergence and optimal solutions.The results from the quality assessment metrics and the statistical analysis validate our conclusions and we propose that the presented work can be used as a guide in choosing parameters for the best possible segmentation results for future works.

AAL and Internet of Medical Things for Monitoring Type-2 Diabetic Patients

“…There are only a few studies available that diagnose the real-time blood glucose level through spectrogram images. Electronic healthcare records (EHR) data deal with tabular datasets that include PIMA [ 39 ] and Luzhou [ 40 ] datasets.…”

Ambient Assistive Living for Monitoring the Physical Activity of Diabetic Adults through Body Area Networks

“…The weight initialization is performed in the truncated normal distribution zero samples. The standard deviation σ is considered in the evaluation process, presented in equation (7) [55].…”

Real UAV-Bird Image Classification Using CNN with a Synthetic Dataset

“…Training, validation, synthetic testing, and real test data were trained, tested, and reported for four different DL networks. Deep learning-based classification networks should be selected considering their speed and accuracy [44]; therefore, in this study, we tested four different networks and compared the speeds and accuracy of the networks to present a comprehensive comparison. All training and testing stages were carried out by using the GPU computing system (GeForce GTX 1080ti, Nvidia Corp., Santa Clara, CA, ABD), 128 gigabyte(GB) random access memory (RAM), I7 processors and the TensorFlow-based [19] Keras [20] library.…”