2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-012-0393-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical evaluation of subsurface trickle irrigation with brackish water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results supported the use of HYDRUS (2D/3D) as an important tool for investigating and designing drip irrigation management practices. Although higher irrigation frequencies were suggested in the literature to be a better drip irrigation practice (Assouline et al 2006), the numerical simulations by Abou Lila et al (2013) showed that the lower irrigation frequency actually produced a bigger wetted soil volume without an increase in water percolation below the plant roots. Skaggs et al (2010) evaluated the effects of the application rate, pulsed water applications, and the antecedent water content on the spreading of water from drip emitters using both field experimental data and numerical HYDRUS (2D/3D) simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results supported the use of HYDRUS (2D/3D) as an important tool for investigating and designing drip irrigation management practices. Although higher irrigation frequencies were suggested in the literature to be a better drip irrigation practice (Assouline et al 2006), the numerical simulations by Abou Lila et al (2013) showed that the lower irrigation frequency actually produced a bigger wetted soil volume without an increase in water percolation below the plant roots. Skaggs et al (2010) evaluated the effects of the application rate, pulsed water applications, and the antecedent water content on the spreading of water from drip emitters using both field experimental data and numerical HYDRUS (2D/3D) simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of the flexibility of HYDRUS (2D/3D) to accommodate different types of boundary conditions and the root uptake of water and nutrients, and because of its ease of use due to a graphical, user-friendly interface, the model has been widely and successfully used to simulate water movement under drip irrigation in many studies (e.g., Cote et al 2003;Skaggs et al 2004;Lazarovitch et al 2009;Kandelous et al 2012;Abou Lila et al 2013;Dabach et al 2013). For example, Skaggs et al (2004) compared experimental soil water distributions for drip irrigation with different irrigation amounts and different irrigation durations (20, 40, and 60 L m −1 of applied water) with the results of numerical simulations with HYDRUS (2D/3D), in which the soil hydraulic properties were obtained using pedotransfer functions (Schaap et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic parameters of each type of soil are shown in table 1. These parameters were taken as in [1] where the same field area was considered in the current study.…”
Section: Materails and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoffman and Shannon, 2007;Abou Lila et al, 2013;D'Odorico et al, 2013), only a limited number of studies have addressed its sustainability on land already affected by salt or when using saline irrigation water. Hoffman and Shannon, 2007;Abou Lila et al, 2013;D'Odorico et al, 2013), only a limited number of studies have addressed its sustainability on land already affected by salt or when using saline irrigation water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%