2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5632(03)80212-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical evaluation of master integrals from differential equations

Abstract: The 4-th order Runge-Kutta method in the complex plane is proposed for numerically advancing the solutions of a system of first order differential equations in one external invariant satisfied by the master integrals related to a Feynman graph. The particular case of the general massive 2-loop sunrise self-mass diagram is analyzed. The method offers a reliable and robust approach to the direct and precise numerical evaluation of master integrals.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So one can integrate the differential equations from the initial conditions at s = 0 to the desired value of s using well-known numerical techniques such as Runge-Kutta. For the integrals of the type S, T, U , this has already been done and explained in detail in [45]- [48]. Here, I will extend these results to include the master integral M , and present results for S, T, U integrals in a different basis which may be more convenient for some purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So one can integrate the differential equations from the initial conditions at s = 0 to the desired value of s using well-known numerical techniques such as Runge-Kutta. For the integrals of the type S, T, U , this has already been done and explained in detail in [45]- [48]. Here, I will extend these results to include the master integral M , and present results for S, T, U integrals in a different basis which may be more convenient for some purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Standard computer numerical methods (for example, Runge-Kutta, or improvements thereof) are used to evolve the differential equations from s = 0 to the desired s. Since the physical-sheet s is always taken to have an infinitesimal real imaginary part, and branch cuts lie along the real s axis, one should take the contour of integration to lie in the upper-half complex plane. Reference [48] suggests using a rectangular contour going from 0 to ih to s+ih to s+iε, where h is chosen large enough to stay away from singularities on the real s axis. Independence of the choice of h, and more generally on the choice of contour in the upper half-plane, provides a useful check on the numerical convergence.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluation By Differential Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It considerably reduces the complexity of the calculation and allows for new qualitative and quantitative results for this important particular class of Feynman integrals [25,37,38,39,40,41]. Configuration space techniques can be used to verify known results obtained within other techniques both analytically and numerically [42,43,44,45] and to investigate some general features of Feynman diagram calculation [46,30,39,47,48,49,50,51]. We list features of the x-space technique in turn with the aim to show how efficient the method is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For TSIL, we instead use the differential equations method [51,52] to evaluate the integrals numerically. For the S, T and U integrals, this strategy was proposed and implemented in [53][54][55][56][57]. The method was rewritten in terms of the S, T, U integrals and extended to M in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%