2020
DOI: 10.1615/jpormedia.2020033043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Evaluation of Groundwater Flows: Modflow vs. Fe Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study presented herein employed the method of Wang et al (2013) to calculate water intake from seepage wells. Radiant pipes and galleries were conceptualized as a series of interconnected nodes and pipes, which were superposed on the finite difference grid of MODFLOW, a modeling environment for practical applications in three-dimensional groundwater flow, which has been widely to overcome issues related to groundwater (Al-Hashmi 2020; Vellando et al 2020). According to the actual position of each node, its plane and vertical positions were determined to simulate the actual radiant pipes and galleries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study presented herein employed the method of Wang et al (2013) to calculate water intake from seepage wells. Radiant pipes and galleries were conceptualized as a series of interconnected nodes and pipes, which were superposed on the finite difference grid of MODFLOW, a modeling environment for practical applications in three-dimensional groundwater flow, which has been widely to overcome issues related to groundwater (Al-Hashmi 2020; Vellando et al 2020). According to the actual position of each node, its plane and vertical positions were determined to simulate the actual radiant pipes and galleries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%