2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2044-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical evaluation of buckling behavior in space structure considering geometrical parameters with joint rigidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicates the length of the i th member. If the required slenderness ratio is not be satisfied for compression elements, the allowable stress must not exceed the value of ( 12 2 23 2 ) ever [31]. This example as the complex sizing structural optimization is solved using selected methods and the achieved results are illustrated in Table 5.…”
Section: Sizing Optimization Of a Spatial 582-bar Towermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…indicates the length of the i th member. If the required slenderness ratio is not be satisfied for compression elements, the allowable stress must not exceed the value of ( 12 2 23 2 ) ever [31]. This example as the complex sizing structural optimization is solved using selected methods and the achieved results are illustrated in Table 5.…”
Section: Sizing Optimization Of a Spatial 582-bar Towermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the additional criteria (e.g. buckling criterion) on solving this class of problems can rise the complexity level of them [2]. Several investigations made in this field are available in the literature [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers found a significant impact of the joint rigidity on the buckling capacity, and post-buckling behavior including the snap-through existence in the SF domes (López et al 2007;Shon et al 2014). Gidófalvy (2012) concluded that the effect of joint-rigidity on the buckling load of single-layer steel grid shells was significant in large span dome compared to relatively small span.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopez et al (2007Lopez et al ( , 2011 sets the joints as rigid body, and connects the members with the joints through small-section members to simulate the stiffness of the joints and derive its stiffness matrix. Shon et al (2014) analyzed the performance of the space structure by introducing a stiffness coefficient. Wang et al (2000) derived a calculation formula of the bending stiffness of a round tubular WHS joint through numerical simulation and regression analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%