2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical evaluation of a subsea equipment installation method designed to avoid resonant responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained from the two cases in the same state were in good agreement with each other. As shown in Figure 5a,b, the drag force ( X,EXP F ) and the offset angle ( X,EXP α ) in the Equations (1) and (2) can be approximated and simplified to (3) and (4). The length of wire is small and its hydrodynamic force has little effect when compared with the drag force and weight of the module.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data obtained from the two cases in the same state were in good agreement with each other. As shown in Figure 5a,b, the drag force ( X,EXP F ) and the offset angle ( X,EXP α ) in the Equations (1) and (2) can be approximated and simplified to (3) and (4). The length of wire is small and its hydrodynamic force has little effect when compared with the drag force and weight of the module.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first term is total resistance (frictional resistance F f and pressure resistance F pv ). The second term is the horizontal component of the drag force acting on the wire and p 0 (z) is the pressure at level z. Equations (1) and (2) can be approximated and simplified to (3) and (4). The length of wire is small and its hydrodynamic force has little effect when compared with the drag force and weight of the module.…”
Section: Physical Modeling Of the Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation