2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical estimation of extreme waves and surges over the northwest Pacific Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the reanalysis or dynamic and parametric typhoon winds is believed to generate a better wind field in both the near-field and far-field regions of typhoons for storm wave and surge modeling [1,4,5,15,[46][47][48]. Hence, two methods were applied to construct the hybrid winds from the CFSV2 and MRV and from the ERA5 and MRV.…”
Section: Hybrid Typhoon Wind Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the reanalysis or dynamic and parametric typhoon winds is believed to generate a better wind field in both the near-field and far-field regions of typhoons for storm wave and surge modeling [1,4,5,15,[46][47][48]. Hence, two methods were applied to construct the hybrid winds from the CFSV2 and MRV and from the ERA5 and MRV.…”
Section: Hybrid Typhoon Wind Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, reanalysis wind data is inferior around the typhoon center but superior in the areas away from the center of the typhoon [53]. A combined usage of the parametric typhoon model and a reanalysis wind data is believed to generate better wind fields for an entire typhoon.…”
Section: (3) Hybrid Typhoon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial database highly influences the assessment of extreme significant wave heights (Godoi et al, 2017;Lucas et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018;Ribal and Young, 2019). In previous studies, the long-term continuous database is usually employed as the initial database, such as a 32-year measured significant wave height in the Gulf of Maine (Viselli et al, 2015), a 44-year hindcasted significant wave height in the North Atlantic Ocean (Muraleedharan et al, 2016) and a 22-year hindcasted significant wave height in the Yellow Sea (Gao et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%