2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02705276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical consistency check between two approaches to radiative corrections for neutrino masses and mixings

Abstract: We briefly outline the two popular approaches on radiative corrections to neutrino masses and mixing angles, and then carry out a detailed numerical analysis for a consistency check between them in MSSM. We find that the two approaches are nearly consistent with a discrepancy of a factor of 13% in mass eigenvalues at low energy scale but the predictions on mixing angles are almost consistent. We check the stability of the three types of neutrino models, i.e., hierarchical, inverted hierarchical and degenerate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where m f corresponds to m τ tan β for (m, n) = (6, 2), tan β = 40 in case of charged lepton and m t for (m, n) = (8,4) in the case of up quarks [24,25]. λ = 0.22 is the standard Wolfenstein parameter.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m f corresponds to m τ tan β for (m, n) = (6, 2), tan β = 40 in case of charged lepton and m t for (m, n) = (8,4) in the case of up quarks [24,25]. λ = 0.22 is the standard Wolfenstein parameter.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type-IHB is found to be more stable under radiative corrections in MSSM [17][18][19], whereas Type-IHA is more stable under the presence of left-handed Higgs triplet term in Type-II see-saw mechanism [20]. For our present analysis, we will not address the issue of stability of neutrino mass model.…”
Section: Analysis Of Inverted Hierarchical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where m f corresponds to m τ tan β for (m, n) = (6, 2), tan β = 40 in case of charged lepton (CL) and m t for (m, n) = (8,4) in the case of up-quarks (UQ) [30,31]. λ = 0.22 is the standard Wolfenstein parameter.…”
Section: Fig 11: Right Handed Neutrino Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%