2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.03.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical comparisons of gyrokinetic multi-water-bag models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPM2), p = 17 which corresponds to LAGH17, and Lauritzen which corresponds to the reconstruction proposed in [14]. One can observe that the linear part is well reproduced by all the method since the instability rate of all the methods is very close to the analytical one proposed by [4].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…PPM2), p = 17 which corresponds to LAGH17, and Lauritzen which corresponds to the reconstruction proposed in [14]. One can observe that the linear part is well reproduced by all the method since the instability rate of all the methods is very close to the analytical one proposed by [4].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The growth rate can be obtained by a generalization of the approach performed in [4]. Hence, growth rates obtained in [4] can be compared to numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the uniform case, we are able to check the linear phase behaviour by solving numerically the dispersion relation and compare the simulation output with it (see also [25,26]). Note that the dispersion relation depends on k : this permits to compare simulations in the oblique and uniform case, in order to check the correctness of the simulations in the oblique case, as we will see.…”
Section: Comparison With Classical (Not Aligned) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%