Numerical comparison of local transceiver arrays of fractionated dipoles and microstrip antennas for body imaging at 7 T

Abstract

Longitudinally orientated dipoles and microstrip antennas have both demonstrated superior results as RF transmit elements for body imaging at 7 T MRI, and are as of today the most commonly used transmit elements. In this study, the performances of the two antenna concepts were compared for use in local RF antenna arrays by numerical simulations. Antenna elements investigated are the fractionated dipole and the microstrip line with meander structures. Phantom simulations with a single antenna element were performed and evaluated with regard to specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency in the center of the subject. Simulations of array configurations with 8 and 16 elements were performed with anatomical body models. Both antenna elements were combined with a loop coil to compare hybrid configurations. Singular value decomposition of the B1+ fields, RF shimming, and calculation of the voxel‐wise power and SAR efficiencies were performed in regions of interest with varying sizes to evaluate the transmit performance. The signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated to estimate the receive performance. Simulated data show similar transmit profiles for the two antenna types in the center of the phantom (penetration depth > 20 mm). For body imaging, no considerable differences were determined for the different antenna configurations with regard to the transmit performance. Results show the advantage of 16 transmit channels compared with today's commonly used 8‐channel systems (minimum RF shimming excitation error of 4.7% (4.3%) versus 2.7% (2.8%) for the 8‐channel and 16‐channel configurations with the microstrip antennas in a (5 cm)3 cube in the center of a male (female) body model). Highest SNR is achieved for the 16‐channel configuration with fractionated dipoles. The combination of either fractionated dipoles or microstrip antennas with loop coils is more favorable with regard to the transmit performance compared with only increasing the number of elements.

Comparison of tight‐fitting 7T parallel‐transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics

“…This excitation uniformity performance improvement was at the cost of greater local SAR, however. Similarly, at 7T, Stelter et al 15 compared the performance of dipole and microstrip arrays and their combinations with loop elements (up to 16 elements) for body imaging. They found that dipole‐based and microstrip‐based arrays have similar transmit performance, but that hybrid arrangements (loops + dipoles or microstrips) have a slight performance advantage.…”