2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2794-1_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Comparison of Elliptical and Conical Cavity Receiver of Solar Parabolic Dish Collector System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that there was an increment in thermal efficiency by 5.63% at 100 • C and 40.45% at 200 • C for conical cavity [17]. Two different types of cavity receiver designs were studied numerically in an analysis executed by Tharun et al(2022).Two different deigns were conical and elliptical cavity receiver. The analysis was performed on different inclination, temperature and aspect ratio of the cavity receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was observed that there was an increment in thermal efficiency by 5.63% at 100 • C and 40.45% at 200 • C for conical cavity [17]. Two different types of cavity receiver designs were studied numerically in an analysis executed by Tharun et al(2022).Two different deigns were conical and elliptical cavity receiver. The analysis was performed on different inclination, temperature and aspect ratio of the cavity receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was performed on different inclination, temperature and aspect ratio of the cavity receivers. Results showed that elliptical cavity receiver has more heat transfer coefficient as compare to other receiver [18]. An experimental and computational investigation was presented by Reynolds et al(2004) to examine the heat loss and flow patterns of trapezoidal cavity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%