2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical characterization of three-dimensional bluff body shear layer behaviour

Abstract: Three-dimensional bluff body aerodynamics are pertinent across a broad range of engineering disciplines. In three-dimensional bluff body flows, shear layer behaviour has a primary influence on the surface pressure distributions and, therefore, the integrated forces and moments. There currently exists a significant gap in understanding of the flow around canonical three-dimensional bluff bodies such as rectangular prisms and short circular cylinders. High-fidelity numerical experiments using a hybrid turbulence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When normalized by the initial values, x R 0 , the trend is apparently a weak function of Reynolds number with the reattachment lengths changing only a few per cent. It is noteworthy that this lack of dependency on Reynolds number has been recently confirmed in a three dimensional numerical simulation of a 3-D rectangular prism conducted by Prosser & Smith (2016) indicating that the two-dimensional nature of the current PIV data is still sufficient to capture most of the important physical phenomena associated with the shear layer.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Dependencymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When normalized by the initial values, x R 0 , the trend is apparently a weak function of Reynolds number with the reattachment lengths changing only a few per cent. It is noteworthy that this lack of dependency on Reynolds number has been recently confirmed in a three dimensional numerical simulation of a 3-D rectangular prism conducted by Prosser & Smith (2016) indicating that the two-dimensional nature of the current PIV data is still sufficient to capture most of the important physical phenomena associated with the shear layer.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Dependencymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Their results showed that the AR and Re have a great influence on the vortex shedding pattern, and five types of vortex shedding patterns were identified as: (I) periodic oblique vortex shedding (large AR, Re > Re c ); (II) quasi-periodic oblique vortex shedding (large AR, Re < Re c ); (III) hairpin vortex that periodically falls off (moderate AR); (IV) two stable counter-rotating vortex pairs (small AR and Re); (V) the counter-rotating vortex pairs alternately shed from the free ends (small AR, high Re). Prosser & Smith (2016) conducted large-eddy simulations coupled with the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (NS) equations using a finite-volume method to study the flow around bluff bodies (finite cylinder or prism) with much higher Re in the range of [10 5 , 10 6 ] and AR = 1 and 2. The influences of the geometric features and attitude of the bluff body on the reattachment distance, pressure coefficient and stagnation point position were investigated and modelled empirically.…”
Section: Flows Past a Finite Cylinder With Two Free Endsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the cylinder with two free ends, e.g. submarine-like shape (Tezuka & Suzuki 2006;Sheard, Thompson & Hourigan 2008), torpedoes-like shape (Schouveiler & Provansal 2001), wheels (Zdravkovich et al 1989) and the short cylindrical bluff bodies (Prosser & Smith 2016;Yang et al 2021) etc. However, compared with the extensively studied flow past an infinite cylinder, there are relatively fewer works on the flow past a finite-length cylinder with two free ends and, thus, the current understanding of the flow dynamics past a finite-length cylinder is insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosser Daniel T. and Smith Marilyn J. [10,11] used LES model and full-scale model flight tests to study the flow around the bluff body ( ⁄ = 1, 2) at 1×10 5 ≤ ≤ 1×10 6 . For the first time, the influence of angle of attack (0-90°) on the aerodynamic parameters of a short cylindrical bluff body is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%