2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical characterization of imperfection sensitive composite structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: Critical axial buckling loads (݇ܰ) for the imperfect cylinders Z23, Z25 and Z26 measured imperfection amplitude (݉ ଵ = 120, ݉ ଶ = 30, ݊ ଶ = 55) proposed model with geometric imperfections caused by a lateral load, currently investigated by [35]), was verified for cylinder Z33 [36], with ܴ ଵ = 250 ݉݉ ), ply thickness 0.125 ݉݉ and lamina properties: ‫ܧ‬ ଵଵ = 123 695 ‫.ܽܲܩ‬ The results of Table 7 show that the proposed model results in an 25, ݊ ଶ = 45. show that the current implementation [28] was in average 8 times slower than Abaqus and the bottleneck is the numerical integration of the non-linear stiffness matrices ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ, ሾ‫ܭ‬ ீ ሿ and ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ. When these matrices ar for each integration point only the stiffness matrix corresponding to the element containing this integration point has to be evaluated, whereas in the Ritz method the whole stiffness matrix has to be evaluated for each s of freedom are the amplitudes of the approximation functions of the field variables.…”
Section: Buckling Of Imperfect Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: Critical axial buckling loads (݇ܰ) for the imperfect cylinders Z23, Z25 and Z26 measured imperfection amplitude (݉ ଵ = 120, ݉ ଶ = 30, ݊ ଶ = 55) proposed model with geometric imperfections caused by a lateral load, currently investigated by [35]), was verified for cylinder Z33 [36], with ܴ ଵ = 250 ݉݉ ), ply thickness 0.125 ݉݉ and lamina properties: ‫ܧ‬ ଵଵ = 123 695 ‫.ܽܲܩ‬ The results of Table 7 show that the proposed model results in an 25, ݊ ଶ = 45. show that the current implementation [28] was in average 8 times slower than Abaqus and the bottleneck is the numerical integration of the non-linear stiffness matrices ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ, ሾ‫ܭ‬ ீ ሿ and ሾ‫ܭ‬ ሿ. When these matrices ar for each integration point only the stiffness matrix corresponding to the element containing this integration point has to be evaluated, whereas in the Ritz method the whole stiffness matrix has to be evaluated for each s of freedom are the amplitudes of the approximation functions of the field variables.…”
Section: Buckling Of Imperfect Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to apply the proposed model many authors ( [16] [19] [31] [32] [33] [34][35] (−51/+51/−45/+45/−37/+37/−19/+19/0/0), ply thickness 8.708 ‫,ܽܲܩ‬ ߥ ଵଶ = 0.28, ‫ܩ‬ ଵଶ = ‫ܩ‬ ଵଷ = ‫ܩ‬ ଶଷ = 5.695 average error of 1.04% with ݉ ଵ = 120, ݉ ଶ = 25…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several preliminary studies performed by the authors can be found in Degenhardt et al [8,9], Castro et al [10] and Arbelo et al [11]. The main challenge for the modeling of this type of structures is how to define a reliable set of imperfections that can represent the original Fig.…”
Section: Buckling Load Estimation Of Curved Panels and Cylindrical Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imperfection sensitivity exhibited by cylindrical shells renders particular emphasis on their design against instability in axial compression. Therefore, robust design approaches are being developed and validated, such as single perturbation load, single perturbation displacement, single boundary perturbation approaches, and their modifications (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]) in order to replace the existing overconservative design guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%