Numerical Characterization of Cohesive and Non-Cohesive ‘Sediments’ under Different Consolidation States Using 3D DEM Triaxial Experiments

Abstract

The Discrete Element Method has been widely used to simulate geo-materials due to time and scale limitations met in the field and laboratories. While cohesionless geo-materials were the focus of many previous studies, the deformation of cohesive geo-materials in 3D remained poorly characterized. Here, we aimed to generate a range of numerical ‘sediments’, assess their mechanical response to stress and compare their response with laboratory tests, focusing on differences between the micro- and macro-material properties. We simulated two endmembers—clay (cohesive) and sand (cohesionless). The materials were tested in a 3D triaxial numerical setup, under different simulated burial stresses and consolidation states. Variations in particle contact or individual bond strengths generate first order influence on the stress–strain response, i.e., a different deformation style of the numerical sand or clay. Increased burial depth generates a second order influence, elevating peak shear strength. Loose and dense consolidation states generate a third order influence of the endmember level. The results replicate a range of sediment compositions, empirical behaviors and conditions. We propose a procedure to characterize sediments numerically. The numerical ‘sediments’ can be applied to simulate processes in sediments exhibiting variations in strength due to post-seismic consolidation, bioturbation or variations in sedimentation rates.

Effect of Moisture Content on Frictional Properties of Some Selected Grains in Indonesia

“…Typically, grains did not have a significant, cohesive force to create surface tension between two types of granular materials (McLaren et al, 2019). It was also reported that for loose sand, which was comparable to dry agricultural grains, the cohesion force should be neglected (Elyashiv et al, 2020).…”

Safety Risk Analysis of a New Design of Basalt Fiber Gabion Slope Based on Improved 3D Discrete Element Method and Monitoring Data

“…The sample of 16,326 balls is shown in Figure 7 a with a size of 2.4 m × 4.8 m (diameter × height). We adopted the contact bond model for soil, which can truly reflect the mechanical properties of clay materials [ 31 , 32 ]. In PFC3D, the idea of obtaining soil’s micro-parameters is as shown in Figure 7 b.…”