1984
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/17/14/025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical calculations of critical densities for lines and planes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As these differences will impact permeability independent from variations in the aperture distribution, we quantify connectivity using two percolation parameters (Table 1). The first parameter is the commonly used percolation probability defined by fracture density and the number of intersections, normalized by the outcrop area [Robinson, 1983[Robinson, , 1984. However, as this method does not fully consider fracture length, we also perform a cluster analysis, where the percolation probability is a function of the area of rock covered by a connected network versus total outcrop area [Berkowitz and Balberg, 1993;Berkowitz, 1995].…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As these differences will impact permeability independent from variations in the aperture distribution, we quantify connectivity using two percolation parameters (Table 1). The first parameter is the commonly used percolation probability defined by fracture density and the number of intersections, normalized by the outcrop area [Robinson, 1983[Robinson, , 1984. However, as this method does not fully consider fracture length, we also perform a cluster analysis, where the percolation probability is a function of the area of rock covered by a connected network versus total outcrop area [Berkowitz and Balberg, 1993;Berkowitz, 1995].…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical stress analysis assumes a N-S maximum horizontal stress: (a) Critically stressed aperture for power law aperture scaling with an exponent of 0.8; (b) aperture as a function of length, using total fracture length; and (c) Barton-Bandis aperture distribution. The percolation probability as defined by [Robinson, 1983[Robinson, , 1984 This constant trend results from the large contrast between matrix and fracture, as the intrinsic fracture permeability is 2.1 × 10 6 darcy. The relative impact of fractures on permeability in the different pavements is a function of fracture intensity.…”
Section: Coulomb Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to modeling flow and transport in fracture networks, which is able to capture distinct preferential flow paths and channeling, is based on percolation theory [e.g., Engtman et at., 1983; Robinson, 1983Robinson, , 1984Hestir and Long, 1990; Batberg et at., 1991; Berkowitz and Batberg, 1993; Berkowitz, 1995]. In this framework, network structures that are near the percolation threshold display channeling patterns and transport properties that are quantifiable by power law relationships.…”
Section: Paper Number 98wr01648mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limit p= 1 the model reduces to the extensively studied case of a uniformly random network [4,[14][15][16][17][18]24,32]. However, for p B1 there are effective interactions between the particles that tend to enhance cluster formation.…”
Section: Flocculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their practical applications, 2D deposition models have been the topic of intense study in their own right. In particular, they have been extensively studied in the context of continuum percolation theory [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. These models have included both uniformly random networks of various objects as well as some that include hard and soft-core interactions between the constituent particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%