2010
DOI: 10.1299/kikaic.76.3728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Calculation of Particles Velocity under the Compressible Fluid in Fine Particle Bombardments(Machine Elements, Design and Manufacturing)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15) In contrast, the 4 mm nozzle required that the compressibility of the gas be considered. A theoretical calculation gave a value for the gas velocity at the tip of the nozzle of 314 m/ s 16) , although a more accurate value could be obtained from numerical analysis, which considers the effect of viscosity.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) In contrast, the 4 mm nozzle required that the compressibility of the gas be considered. A theoretical calculation gave a value for the gas velocity at the tip of the nozzle of 314 m/ s 16) , although a more accurate value could be obtained from numerical analysis, which considers the effect of viscosity.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to clarify the reason for this, the velocity of the shot particles was analyzed based on the model that the authors' research group has proposed [20,21]. In our numerical calculation, the velocity of shot particles with various diameters through a convergent nozzle was analyzed from the following formula (1), in assuming that the air passing through the nozzle was considered as a compressible fluid.…”
Section: Effect Of Shot Particle Diameter On the Surface Microstructumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yonekura et al [1] reported that the fatigue strength of FPP treated ferrite-pearlite steel was higher than that of the same material treated with conventional shot peening due to the generation of higher and more stable compressive residual stress on the 4 treated surface. Moreover, FPP is very effective for creating fine crystal grains [15,16,18,19] because the particle velocity in FPP is higher than that in conventional shot peening [17,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, air velocity in the potential core region, Up (9) y Then, we calculate the theoretical value of the particle velocity solved numerically Eq. (1) by the Runge-Kutta method [8].…”
Section: N Nozzle Exitmentioning
confidence: 99%