Numerical calculation of boundary layers and wake characteristics of high-speed trains with different lengths

Abstract

Trains with different numbers of cars running in the open air were simulated using the delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES). The numbers of cars included in the simulation are 3, 4, 5 and 8. The aim of this study was to investigate how train length influences the boundary layer, the wake flow, the surface pressure, the aerodynamic drag and the friction drag. To certify the accuracy of the mesh and methods, the drag coefficients from numerical simulation of trains with 3 cars were compared with those from the wind tunnel test, and agreement was obtained. The results show that the boundary layer is thicker and the wake vortices are less symmetric as the train length increases. As a result, train length greatly affects pressure. The upper surface pressure of the tail car reduced by 2.9%, the side surface pressure of the tail car reduced by 8.3% and the underneath surface pressure of the tail car reduced by 19.7% in trains that included 3 cars to those including 8 cars. In addition, train length also has a significant effect on the friction drag coefficient and the drag coefficient. The friction drag coefficient of each car in a configuration decreases along the length of the train. In a comparison between trains consisting of 3 cars to those consisting of 8 cars, the friction drag coefficient of the tail car reduced by 8.6% and the drag coefficient of the tail car reduced by 3.7%.

An Investigation of Influence of Windshield Configuration and Train Length on High-Speed Train Aerodynamic Performance

“…9, vortices are seen at 0.3H from the tail nose, whose topology becomes asymmetric with increased train length. A similar observation was made by Jia et al (2017). When the vertical plane is at 0.15H, the asymmetric counter-rotating vortices are more visible except for the 3-car group trains in Case 1, 3 and 4, as shown in Fig.…”

Numerical investigation of the effect of cavity flow on high speed train pantograph aerodynamic noise

“…However, some high speed train has them in the middle of the coach. Therefore, it is noted that the boundary layer in front of the cavity could be thicker than for the cases in this paper [20,21]. This means that incoming flow speed in the vicinity of the rasied pantograph is slower than that in the cases in this paper (12% in the panhead region [20]).…”

“…When the pantograph and the recess were placed on a middle coach, the incoming flow of the upper arm and the panhead region of the pantograph is about 20% slower than the speed for a case with a very thin boundary layer. Jia et al [21] carried out a numerical investigation of the boundary layer and wake flow features with three different train lengths at 1/8 scale at a speed of 60 m/s. They found that the boundary layer became thicker along the train length, and there was a significant difference between the boundary layer thickness of the leading coach and the tail coach.…”

Influence of Marshalling Length on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Urban Emus under Crosswind

“…Therefore, scholars research how the marshalling lengths affects the outflow field around train under different conditions. Jia et al (2017) study how train length influences the wake flow. The results show that the longer the train length, the worse the wake symmetry.…”