2022
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12101658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Assessment on Bonded and Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Beams

Abstract: The tendon stress in bonded prestressed concrete (BPC) beams is section-dependent while it is member-dependent in unbonded prestressed concrete (UPC) beams, leading to marked difference between these two structural systems. However, little work has addressed the bond effect of steel tendons. This research presents comparative investigations of BPC and UPC beams with various prestress levels. A numerical model is experimentally validated. Numerical assessments are conducted for simply supported and continuous s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical models of PC structures with unbonded tendons were also proposed. Some authors compared the global response of PC beams with bonded and internally unbonded tendons, finding significant differences in terms of cracking pattern as well as ultimate load capacity and deflection 32 . A parametric finite element analysis (FEA) was also carried out to investigate the influence of the prestressing levels on the flexural response of beams with unbonded tendons, revealing that higher effective prestress leads to higher load‐carrying capacity at ultimate stage even if with lower deflection (i.e., reduced ductility) 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical models of PC structures with unbonded tendons were also proposed. Some authors compared the global response of PC beams with bonded and internally unbonded tendons, finding significant differences in terms of cracking pattern as well as ultimate load capacity and deflection 32 . A parametric finite element analysis (FEA) was also carried out to investigate the influence of the prestressing levels on the flexural response of beams with unbonded tendons, revealing that higher effective prestress leads to higher load‐carrying capacity at ultimate stage even if with lower deflection (i.e., reduced ductility) 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors compared the global response of PC beams with bonded and internally unbonded tendons, finding significant differences in terms of cracking pattern as well as ultimate load capacity and deflection. 32 A parametric finite element analysis (FEA) was also carried out to investigate the influence of the prestressing levels on the flexural response of beams with unbonded tendons, revealing that higher effective prestress leads to higher load-carrying capacity at ultimate stage even if with lower deflection (i.e., reduced ductility). 33 Some attempts to simplify the complex, member-dependent, stress-strain distribution along unbonded tendons assuming them as constants were also proposed using both FEs 34,35 or applied elements (AEs) 36 methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%