2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13137-019-0127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical aspects of hydro-mechanical coupling of fluid-filled fractures using hybrid-dimensional element formulations and non-conformal meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of hydraulic characterization of fractures, their contact mechanics may thus be reduced to an account of their normal stiffness (Pyrak-Nolte and Morris 2000). Hence, we apply a hydro-mechanical model considering the constitutive relation of normal contact following a monolithic numerical implementation (Schmidt and Steeb 2019) for the numerical determination of characteristic fracture parameters, initial width or aperture hyd 0 , and normal stiffness parameter E Fr . The third characteristic parameter, the fracture length l Fr , is an element of the modeled fracturedomain discretization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the context of hydraulic characterization of fractures, their contact mechanics may thus be reduced to an account of their normal stiffness (Pyrak-Nolte and Morris 2000). Hence, we apply a hydro-mechanical model considering the constitutive relation of normal contact following a monolithic numerical implementation (Schmidt and Steeb 2019) for the numerical determination of characteristic fracture parameters, initial width or aperture hyd 0 , and normal stiffness parameter E Fr . The third characteristic parameter, the fracture length l Fr , is an element of the modeled fracturedomain discretization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hydro-mechanical phenomena, such as reverse water-level fluctuations in distant monitoring wells (Rodrigues 1983;Kim and Parizek 1997) or insensitivity of pressure responses to increases in flow rates, so-called jacking (Quirion and Tournier 2010), cannot be reproduced by pressure-diffusion models and result in inaccurate approximations of the effective fracture characteristics (Vinci et al 2014a;Murdoch and Germanovich 2006;Cappa et al 2018). Despite the growing number of treatments of hydro-mechanical coupling (Murdoch and Germanovich 2006;Girault et al 2015Girault et al , 2016Castelletto et al 2015;Schmidt and Steeb 2019), the understanding of the influence of basic geometrical and mechanical properties of fractures on their hydraulic response to flow rate or pressure perturbations remains limited; a critical obstacle to, e.g., the development of geothermal energy provision from petrothermal reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to minor contribution to the overall solution in the investigated applications, the terms II) and III) will be neglected in the course of this work [1]. The resulting governing equations are solved by using a finite element implementation [4] and a monolithic solution strategy using zero-thickness interface elements for the fracture domain [5,6].…”
Section: Hybrid-dimensional Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical approaches to solve the strongly coupled hydro-mechanical fracture-flow problem addressed in literature can be divided in two groups: (i) monolithic and (ii) partitioned schemes. Monolithic approaches introduce the fracture-flow domain by zero-thickness interface elements [22,[45][46][47] and mostly require direct solution strategies to guarantee high numerical stability since distinct characteristic properties of both domains lead to poor conditioning of the global system [43]. In general, tailored meshing and integration strategies are required to discretize the fracture domain by interface elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%