2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental study on scaled soil-structure model for small shaking table tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sand embankment properties were as follows: i) average unit weight ii) the relative density which were 18 KN/m3 and 60% respectively. These results obtained were similar to that of other researcher swho only used sand embankment without clay soil (Eric et al, 2013;Goktepe et al, 2019;Srilatha et al, 2013). The cyclic behaviour of the soft clay has been analysed based on the different input frequency.…”
Section: Face Displacement Responsesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The sand embankment properties were as follows: i) average unit weight ii) the relative density which were 18 KN/m3 and 60% respectively. These results obtained were similar to that of other researcher swho only used sand embankment without clay soil (Eric et al, 2013;Goktepe et al, 2019;Srilatha et al, 2013). The cyclic behaviour of the soft clay has been analysed based on the different input frequency.…”
Section: Face Displacement Responsesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Typical pore water pressure variations obtained from the tests are presented in Figs. (12)- (14). The height of clayey soil layer (H) was taken as 300 mm in the case of pore water pressure.…”
Section: Effect Of Acceleration On Pore Water Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, shaking is an effective technique to study the seismic response of underground structures embedded in soft soil sites. Goktepeet al [14] observed that the local soil properties have considerably amplified the earthquake response of the structures in comparison to the fixed base structure. Ç elebi et al [15] specified a realistic geometric scaling coefficient for test model to be used in a small-capacity shaking table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE model for the validation test is as shown in Figure 6. A simple frame model was used [33][34][35][36] to validate the proposed vision-based FE model updating method. The element used in the FE model is the beam type, and the material properties are assumed to be elastic, and the basement and slab were applied steel (Unite Weight: 7.85 t/m3, E: 210 GPa, Poisson's Ratio: 0.3), and the wall was applied stainless steel (Unite Weight: 7.90 t/m3, E: 201 GPa, Poisson's Ratio: 0.3).…”
Section: Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%