2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental study of stagnant effective thermal conductivity of a graphite pebble bed with high solid to fluid thermal conductivity ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison between the computed results of our model and the data of Bu et al: , (a) physical models of a 3D granular bed; (b) ETC of the bed containing static interstitial air; and (c) ETC of the bed containing interstitial air with natural convection.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison between the computed results of our model and the data of Bu et al: , (a) physical models of a 3D granular bed; (b) ETC of the bed containing static interstitial air; and (c) ETC of the bed containing interstitial air with natural convection.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to the given conditions in the literature, , the ETC of the bed was computed by using our model, and the results for the bed containing interstitial air that is static and with natural convection are plotted in Figure b,c, respectively. The x -axis is the average temperature of the granular bed [ T bed = ( T h + T c )/2].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…developed a novel dual pore network model (DPNM) to study the drainage process in heterogeneous rocks, in which the micro‐porosity was taken into account, and its accuracy was validated based on the Estaillades limestone rocks. Bu et al 33 . numerically studied the stagnant effective thermal conductivity of a graphite pebble bed, which was validated by the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%