2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0475-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigations of pseudo-shock systems in a planar nozzle: impact of bypass mass flow due to narrow gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the beginning of the propagation, the fluctuation intensity is higher, and at the end, the intensity is lower. Such flow development has been reported by Kameli et al [31], Giglmaier et al [32], and Vignesh et al [35]. Also, Matsuo et al [34], Wang et al [35], and Xue et al [36] have carried out studies on the compressible flow in parallel-walled ducts and reported the presence of the shock train.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…At the beginning of the propagation, the fluctuation intensity is higher, and at the end, the intensity is lower. Such flow development has been reported by Kameli et al [31], Giglmaier et al [32], and Vignesh et al [35]. Also, Matsuo et al [34], Wang et al [35], and Xue et al [36] have carried out studies on the compressible flow in parallel-walled ducts and reported the presence of the shock train.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…standard k À ε model) generally has difficulties to be able to predict the length of separation accurately. With the introduced compressibility modifications, the modified k À ε model preforms much better and even shows advantages to the k À u SST turbulence model which is widely used for separation flow predictions [37,38].…”
Section: Main Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many of the past numerical works on shock trains used linear-eddy viscosity models and do not consider the three-dimensional flow. Numerical work by Giglmaier et al [5] is one of the few that show in detail the benefits of using RSM-based turbulence models for shock train simulations. Scale resolving methods such as LES [6,7] and WMLES [8] show promising results, however, the Reynolds number must often be reduced for the former, and the latter relies on near-wall modelling which may not be applicable in separated regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%