2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8826-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation of inward tube electromagnetic forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FE model established in ABAQUS is demonstrated in Figure 3. The Johnson-Cook constitutive model usually utilized in medium or high strain rate conditions [43][44][45] was considered to describe the dynamic response of the specimens. The Johnson-Cook model is given as follows:…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE model established in ABAQUS is demonstrated in Figure 3. The Johnson-Cook constitutive model usually utilized in medium or high strain rate conditions [43][44][45] was considered to describe the dynamic response of the specimens. The Johnson-Cook model is given as follows:…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DCE process, the strain rate can reach a medium strain rate (10 0 −10 2 s −1 ). Hence, Johnson-Cook constitutive model which was usually utilized for material response under medium or high strain rate such as electromagnetic riveting, 58 shot peening, 59 electromagnetic forming 60 was used to describe the dynamic response of the plate during DCE because of the similarity of these processes. The Johnson–Cook model is given as follows: Where σ is the equivalent flow stress, ε is the plastic equivalent strain, ε .…”
Section: Fe Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubular WP flow stress approximated by Johnson–Cook material model is as given by equation (16). The temperature effect is ignored here as any small rise in temperature has little influence on electrical and mechanical properties of WP material 15–17
Figure 6.Flowchart of sequential coupled simulation.
Figure 7.The 2D axis symmetric arrangement and meshing.
…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%