1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(96)00083-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental analysis of the static characteristics and noise in ungated recessed MESFET structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S I G exhibits an f 2 dependence, whereas the imaginary part of S I GI D increases proportionally to f (the real part of S I GI D is negligible at the frequencies shown). These dependencies obtained are in good agreement with those predicted by the theory for a MOSFET in general [20], and with the results given in the literature for other FET devices, like MESFETs [8] or HEMTs [24].…”
Section: Noisesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S I G exhibits an f 2 dependence, whereas the imaginary part of S I GI D increases proportionally to f (the real part of S I GI D is negligible at the frequencies shown). These dependencies obtained are in good agreement with those predicted by the theory for a MOSFET in general [20], and with the results given in the literature for other FET devices, like MESFETs [8] or HEMTs [24].…”
Section: Noisesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both parameters, together with the lateral position of the contacts, have been chosen in order to minimize the CPU time while ensuring carrier thermalization before reaching the drain contact. Even if these values may not correspond exactly to those employed in fabricated devices, their modification just leads to a change in the resistance of the ohmic regions next to the contacts; an effect that can be compensated for in a post-processing stage by means of considering a series resistance in the contacts [12]. Furthermore, since electron transport in a MOSFET depends basically on the inversion layer under the oxide, the relatively 'low' doping of the source and drain regions does not change the results significantly.…”
Section: Simulated Device and Monte Carlo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Although C dependents strongly on the device geometry itself, the device B tends to show the somewhat smaller C than the others .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The power spectral densities of the auto‐correlation of noise sources at the gate and drain terminals S ig ( f ), S id ( f ), and the cross‐correlation between them S idig ( f ) are determined by the fast Fourier transform of the current fluctuations Δ I gs and Δ I ds at the gate and drain terminals in the steady state, respectively. The intrinsic dimensionless noise parameters P , R , and C , which represent the drain and the gate noise sources and their cross‐correlation, are also calculated by using the noise spectral densities and the Y parameters, as the following formulas : P=Sid4knormalBT0true|Y21true|,R=Sigtrue|Y21true|4knormalBT0|Y11|2,C=SidigSidSig, where k B is the Boltzmann constant and T 0 the reference temperature of 300 K. These would provide the information about the origin of the noise of the device.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the surface potential at the cap and recess surfaces of the device is modelled through a fixed negative surface charge (which is a good approximation at low biasing) that provokes carrier depletion in its surroundings [29][30][31]. The value of the surface charge is not the same in the whole device, since in the bottom of the recess the interface semiconductor is non-doped AlInAs (or AlSb in Sb-HEMTs), while in the rest it is the highly doped cap layer material.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%