1999
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and Arithmetical Cognition: Patterns of Functions and Deficits in Children at Risk for a Mathematical Disability

Abstract: Based on performance on standard achievement tests, first-grade children (mean age ϭ 82 months) with IQ scores in the low-average to high-average range were classified as at risk for a learning disability (LD) in mathematics, reading, or both. These at-risk children (n ϭ 55) and a control group of academically normal peers (n ϭ 35) were administered experimental tasks that assessed number comprehension and production skills, counting knowledge, arithmetic skills, working memory, and ease of retrieving informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

22
314
5
43

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(110 reference statements)
22
314
5
43
Order By: Relevance
“…These models, including the examples in Tables 5 and 6, were as accurate in predicting MLD as was the model including multiple standard composite scores seen in Table 2. Thus, although we could not significantly improve the ROC of ~0.90 obtained when using all composite scores, we were able to find models including six to eight items that also had ROC values of ~0.90.These findings offer some support for the notion that MLD results primarily from deficits in numeric processing (e.g., Landerl et al, 2004), as measured by skills in reading numerals, counting principles (Geary et al, 1999), number line concepts, and mental addition. In their study, Landerl and colleagues examined numeric-specific and numeric-irrelevant skills, such as numeral naming versus general naming skills, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These models, including the examples in Tables 5 and 6, were as accurate in predicting MLD as was the model including multiple standard composite scores seen in Table 2. Thus, although we could not significantly improve the ROC of ~0.90 obtained when using all composite scores, we were able to find models including six to eight items that also had ROC values of ~0.90.These findings offer some support for the notion that MLD results primarily from deficits in numeric processing (e.g., Landerl et al, 2004), as measured by skills in reading numerals, counting principles (Geary et al, 1999), number line concepts, and mental addition. In their study, Landerl and colleagues examined numeric-specific and numeric-irrelevant skills, such as numeral naming versus general naming skills, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Phonological processing skills as tapped by tasks requiring the manipulation of phonological structure are highly associated with both reading ability (e.g., Bradley & Bryant, 1985;Brady & Shankweiler, 1991;Catts, Gillispie, Leonard, Kail, & Miller, 2002;Stanovich & Siegel, 1994;Wagner & Torgesen, 1987;Wolf & Bowers, 1999) and mathematical skills (e.g., Geary, Hoard, & Hamson, 1999;Rourke & Conway, 1997). It has been argued that both phonological processing and STM measures reflect a common phonological processing substrate (Bowey, 1996;Metsala, 1999).…”
Section: Working Memory In Children With Reading Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geary and colleagues use the term "mathematical disabilities" and include all children who fall below the 30th percentile (Geary, Hoard, & Hamson, 1999) or 35th percentile (Geary, Hoard, & Hamson, 2000) on the Woodcock -Johnson Mathematics reasoning test (Woodcock & Johnson, 2001). Jordan and colleagues (Hanich, Jordan, Kaplan, & Dick, 2001;Jordan, Hanich, & Kaplan, 2003a;Jordan, Kaplan, & Hanich, 2002) refer to "mathematics difficulties", and include all children below the 35th percentile of the Woodcock -Johnson Broad Mathematics Composite Score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%